Edy.Thanks,Will try to monitor it later on.It may have been a patch (not particular one that got merged) that messed up the ci hosts.Looks better now, recent checks passed.On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Edward Haas <ehaas@redhat.com> wrote:Very strange (and very late), trying to simulate locally.On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:Test trends:On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 12:16 AM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:I'm seeing now this failure on multiple untreated patches.Seems to be related to these patches merged today:https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/topic:ip_refactoring+is:merged ============================================================ ========== FAIL: test_add_delete_and_read_rule (network.ip_rule_test.TestIpRule) ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_check-patch-el7-x86_64/ vdsm/tests/network/ip_rule_tes t.py", line 47, in test_add_delete_and_read_rule self.assertEqual(1, len(rules)) AssertionError: 1 != 2 -------------------- >> begin captured logging << -------------------- 2017-05-12 21:04:18,381 DEBUG (MainThread) [root] /usr/bin/taskset --cpu-list 0-1 /sbin/ip rule add from all to 192.168.99.1 dev lo table main (cwd None) (commands:69) 2017-05-12 21:04:18,393 DEBUG (MainThread) [root] SUCCESS: <err> = ''; <rc> = 0 (commands:93) 2017-05-12 21:04:18,393 DEBUG (MainThread) [root] /usr/bin/taskset --cpu-list 0-1 /sbin/ip rule (cwd None) (commands:69) 2017-05-12 21:04:18,404 DEBUG (MainThread) [root] SUCCESS: <err> = ''; <rc> = 0 (commands:93) 2017-05-12 21:04:18,406 DEBUG (MainThread) [root] /usr/bin/taskset --cpu-list 0-1 /sbin/ip rule del from all to 192.168.99.1 dev lo table main (cwd None) (commands:69) 2017-05-12 21:04:18,417 DEBUG (MainThread) [root] SUCCESS: <err> = ''; <rc> = 0 (commands:93) --------------------- >> end captured logging << ---------------------