Hi Yaniv,

Is there a plan to implement active-active HA in the near future? Is there any progress on it since the discussion in August 2013?

Sunny

2016-03-04 17:38 GMT+09:00 Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com>:


On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Sunny Shin <sunny4s.git@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,

In the new architecture page (http://www.ovirt.org/documentation/architecture/architecture/), overall architecture picture shows that engine supports active-active high availability.

This is inaccurate - the engine is not highly available in A/A architecture. I'd appreciate if you could file an issue for it so we'll fix this page.
 

However, as per engine HA page (http://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/engine/engine-high-availability/), active-active HA is not supported yet and there are several implementation issues.

So, could anyone give me a brief explanation about discrepancy between these two pages, and about the plan to implement this feature if not implemented yet?

I suggest looking at self-hosted engine, which provides non-A/A high availability for the engine.
Y.
 

Sunny

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel