Trying to put together what I remember:
1. We had a QEMU bug where it was stated clearly that
nested-virtualization is only supported when using 'host-passthrough'
(don't know if that had changed since).
2. As consequence of (1) - Lago uses by default host-passthrough.
3. When running O-S-T, we needed a deterministic way to decide which
cluster level to use, taking into account that VDMS's CPU, can be,
theoretically, anything.
4. That is why you see 'Skylake' and 'IvyBridge' there - to match
possible users of OST.
5. Lago already uses 'virsh capabilities' to report the L1 VM's CPU,
lago-ost-plugin uses that report as the input key to the mapping file.
As far as I remember, we settled for this method after several
on-going reports of users unable to run OST on their laptops due to
CPU issues.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Michal Skrivanek
<michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12 Jan 2018, at 17:32, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:05 PM, Michal Skrivanek
> <michal.skrivanek@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12 Jan 2018, at 08:32, Tomas Jelinek <tjelinek@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> See[1] - do we need to update Lago / Lago OST plugin?
>>>
>>>
>>> Something like https://github.com/lago-project/lago-ost-plugin/pull/ 31
>>> perhaps (not tested, don't have the HW).
>>
>>
>> yes, seems like that should do the trick.
>>
>>
>> sure, though, that list is also difficult to maintain
>> e.g. IvyBridge is not an oVirt supported model, there’s no “Skylake” model
>>
>> Nadav, what’s the exact purpose of that list, and can it be eliminated
>> somehow?
>
>
> It's to match, as possible, between the host CPU (which is passed to L1) so
> it'll match oVirt’s.
>
>
> getting it from "virsh capabilities" on the host would match it a bit
> better. It would be enough to just make the L1 host report (via fake caps
> hook if needed) the same model_X in getVdsCapabilities as the L0
>
> It's not that difficult to maintain. We add new CPUs once-twice a year…?
>
>
> yes, not often
>
> Y.
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> michal
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Y.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Error Message
>>>>
>>>> Unsupported CPU model: Haswell-noTSX-IBRS. Supported models:
>>>> IvyBridge,Westmere,Skylake,Penryn,Haswell,Broadwell, Nehalem,Skylake-Client, Broadwell-noTSX,Conroe, SandyBridge,Haswell-noTSX
>>>>
>>>> Stacktrace
>>>>
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>> File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 369, in run
>>>> testMethod()
>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/case.py", line 197, in
>>>> runTest
>>>> self.test(*self.arg)
>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py" , line
>>>> 129, in wrapped_test
>>>> test()
>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py" , line 59,
>>>> in wrapper
>>>> return func(get_test_prefix(), *args, **kwargs)
>>>> File
>>>> "/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-system-tests_master_ check-patch-el7-x86_64/ovirt- system-tests/basic-suite- master/test-scenarios/002_ bootstrap.py",
>>>> line 277, in add_cluster
>>>> add_cluster_4(prefix)
>>>> File
>>>> "/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-system-tests_master_ check-patch-el7-x86_64/ovirt- system-tests/basic-suite- master/test-scenarios/002_ bootstrap.py",
>>>> line 305, in add_cluster_4
>>>> cpu_family = prefix.virt_env.get_ovirt_cpu_family()
>>>> File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/virt.py", line 151,
>>>> in get_ovirt_cpu_family
>>>> ','.join(cpu_map[host.cpu_vendor].iterkeys())
>>>> RuntimeError: Unsupported CPU model: Haswell-noTSX-IBRS. Supported
>>>> models:
>>>> IvyBridge,Westmere,Skylake,Penryn,Haswell,Broadwell, Nehalem,Skylake-Client, Broadwell-noTSX,Conroe, SandyBridge,Haswell-noTSX
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Y.
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_master_ check-patch-el7-x86_64/3498/ testReport/junit/(root)/002_ bootstrap/add_cluster/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Devel mailing list
>>> Devel@ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel@ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel