On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 5:54 PM Dominik Holler <dholler@redhat.com> wrote:


On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 5:48 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:


On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 18:18 Marcin Sobczyk <msobczyk@redhat.com> wrote:


On 11/22/19 4:54 PM, Martin Perina wrote:


On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 4:43 PM Dominik Holler <dholler@redhat.com> wrote:

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:17 PM Dominik Holler <dholler@redhat.com> wrote:


On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:00 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:54 AM Vojtech Juranek <vjuranek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On pátek 22. listopadu 2019 9:56:56 CET Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:49 AM Vojtech Juranek <vjuranek@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On pátek 22. listopadu 2019 9:41:26 CET Dominik Holler wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Dominik Holler <dholler@redhat.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:54 PM Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:24 PM Vojtech Juranek
> > > > >> <vjuranek@redhat.com>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Hi,
> > > > >> > OST fails (see e.g. [1]) in 002_bootstrap.check_update_host. It
> > > > >> > fails
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> with
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >  FAILED! => {"changed": false, "failures": [], "msg": "Depsolve
> > > > >> >  Error
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> occured:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > \n Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
> > > > >> > vdsm-
> > > > >> > network-4.40.0-1236.git63ea8cb8b.el8.x86_64\n  - nothing provides
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> nmstate
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > needed by vdsm-network-4.40.0-1271.git524e08c8a.el8.x86_64\n
> > > > >> > Problem 2:
> > > > >> > package vdsm-python-4.40.0-1271.git524e08c8a.el8.noarch requires
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> vdsm-network
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > = 4.40.0-1271.git524e08c8a.el8, but none of the providers can be
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> installed\n
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > - cannot install the best update candidate for package vdsm-
> > > > >> > python-4.40.0-1236.git63ea8cb8b.el8.noarch\n  - nothing provides
> > > > >> > nmstate
> > > > >> > needed by vdsm-network-4.40.0-1271.git524e08c8a.el8.x86_64\n
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> nmstate should be provided by copr repo enabled by
> > > > >> ovirt-release-master.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I re-triggered as
> > > > > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6131
> > > > > maybe
> > > > > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104825/
> > > > > was missing
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Looks like
> > > > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104825/ is ignored by OST.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > maybe not. You re-triggered with [1], which really missed this patch.
> > > I did a rebase and now running with this patch in build #6132 [2]. Let's
> > > wait
>  for it to see if gerrit #104825 helps.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/standard-manual-runner/909/
> > > [2] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6132/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Miguel, do you think merging
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104495/15/common/yum-repos/ovirt-master-hos
> > > > t-cq
>  .repo.in
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > would solve this?
> >
> >
> > I've split the patch Dominik mentions above in two, one of them adding
> > the nmstate / networkmanager copr repos - [3].
> >
> > Let's see if it fixes it.
>
> it fixes original issue, but OST still fails in
> 098_ovirt_provider_ovn.use_ovn_provider:
>
> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6134

I think Dominik was looking into this issue; +Dominik Holler please confirm.

Let me know if you need any help Dominik.


Thanks.
The problem is that the hosts lost connection to storage:
2019-11-22 05:39:12,326-0500 DEBUG (jsonrpc/5) [common.commands] /usr/bin/taskset --cpu-list 0-1 /usr/bin/sudo -n /sbin/lvm vgs --config 'devices {  preferred_names=["^/dev/mapper/"]  ignore_suspended_devices=1  write_cache_state=0  disable_after_error_count=3  filter=["a|^/dev/mapper/36001405107ea8b4e3ac4ddeb3e19890f$|^/dev/mapper/360014054924c91df75e41178e4b8a80c$|^/dev/mapper/3600140561c0d02829924b77ab7323f17$|^/dev/mapper/3600140582feebc04ca5409a99660dbbc$|^/dev/mapper/36001405c3c53755c13c474dada6be354$|", "r|.*|"] } global {  locking_type=1  prioritise_write_locks=1  wait_for_locks=1  use_lvmetad=0 } backup {  retain_min=50  retain_days=0 }' --noheadings --units b --nosuffix --separator '|' --ignoreskippedcluster -o uuid,name,attr,size,free,extent_size,extent_count,free_count,tags,vg_mda_size,vg_mda_free,lv_count,pv_count,pv_name (cwd None) (commands:153)
2019-11-22 05:39:12,415-0500 ERROR (check/loop) [storage.Monitor] Error checking path /rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share2/d10879c6-8de1-40ba-87fa-f447844eed2a/dom_md/metadata (monitor:501)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/monitor.py", line 499, in _pathChecked
    delay = result.delay()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/check.py", line 391, in delay
    raise exception.MiscFileReadException(self.path, self.rc, self.err)
vdsm.storage.exception.MiscFileReadException: Internal file read failure: ('/rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share2/d10879c6-8de1-40ba-87fa-f447844eed2a/dom_md/metadata', 1, 'Read timeout')
2019-11-22 05:39:12,416-0500 INFO  (check/loop) [storage.Monitor] Domain d10879c6-8de1-40ba-87fa-f447844eed2a became INVALID (monitor:472)

I failed to reproduce local to analyze this, I will try again, any hints welcome.
 


https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104925/1/ shows that 008_basic_ui_sanity.py triggers the problem.
Is there someone with knowledge about the basic_ui_sanity around?
How do you think it's related? By commenting out the ui sanity tests and seeing OST with successful finish?

Looking at 6134 run you were discussing:

 - timing of the ui sanity set-up [1]:

11:40:20 @ Run test: 008_basic_ui_sanity.py:

- timing of first encountered storage error [2]:

2019-11-22 05:39:12,415-0500 ERROR (check/loop) [storage.Monitor] Error checking path /rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share2/d10879c6-8de1-40ba-87fa-f447844eed2a/dom_md/metadata (monitor:501)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/monitor.py", line 499, in _pathChecked
    delay = result.delay()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/vdsm/storage/check.py", line 391, in delay
    raise exception.MiscFileReadException(self.path, self.rc, self.err)
vdsm.storage.exception.MiscFileReadException: Internal file read failure: ('/rhev/data-center/mnt/192.168.200.4:_exports_nfs_share2/d10879c6-8de1-40ba-87fa-f447844eed2a/dom_md/metadata', 1, 'Read timeout')

Timezone difference aside, it seems to me that these storage errors occured before doing anything ui-related.


You are right, a time.sleep(8*60) in
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104925/2
has triggers the issue the same way.

 
I remember talking with Steven Rosenberg on IRC a couple of days ago about some storage metadata issues and he said he got a response from Nir, that "it's a known issue".

Nir, Amit, can you comment on this?

The error mentioned here is not vdsm error but warning about storage accessibility. We sould convert the tracebacks to warning.

The reason for such issue can be misconfigured network (maybe network team is testing negative flows?),

No.
 
or some issue in the NFS server.


Only hint I found is
"Exiting Time2Retain handler because session_reinstatement=1"
but I have no idea what this means or if this is relevant at all.
 
One read timeout is not an issue. We have a real issue only if we have consistent read timeouts or errors for couple of minutes, after that engine can deactivate the storage domain or some hosts if only these hosts are having trouble to access storage.

In OST we never expect such conditions since we don't test negative flows, and we should have good connectivity with the vms running on the same host.


Ack, this seems to be the problem.
 
Nir


[1] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6134/console
[2] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6134/artifact/exported-artifacts/test_logs/basic-suite-master/post-098_ovirt_provider_ovn.py/lago-basic-suite-master-host-0/_var_log/vdsm/vdsm.log


Marcin, could you please take a look?

 
>
> > [3] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/104897/
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >> Who installs this rpm in OST?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I do not understand the question.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >> > [...]
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > See [2] for full error.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Can someone please take a look?
> > > > >> > Thanks
> > > > >> > Vojta
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > [1] https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6128/
> > > > >> > [2]
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/6128/artifact
> > > > >> /
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > exported-artifacts/test_logs/basic-suite-master/
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> post-002_bootstrap.py/lago-
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> basic-suite-master-engine/_var_log/ovirt-engine/engine.log___________
> > > > >> ____
> > > > >> ________________________________>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
> > > > >> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org
> > > > >> > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > oVirt Code of Conduct:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > List Archives:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/4K5N3VQ
> > > > >> N26B
> > > > >> L73K7D45A2IR7R3UMMM23/
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
> > > > >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org
> > > > >> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> > > > >> oVirt Code of Conduct:
> > > > >> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> > > > >> List Archives:
> > > > >> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/JN7MNUZ
> > > > >> N5K3
> > > > >> NS5TGXFCILYES77KI5TZU/
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list -- devel@ovirt.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@ovirt.org
> > Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> > oVirt Code of Conduct:
> > https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives:
> > https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/devel@ovirt.org/message/UPJ5SEAV5Z65H
> > 5BQ3SCHOYZX6JMTQPBW/
>



--
Martin Perina
Manager, Software Engineering
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.