Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:39 Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> ha scritto:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Il giorno mer 28 nov 2018 alle ore 17:13 Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
> ha scritto:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0500, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > > Top posting
> > >
> > > 1) Glusterd2 is not yet the default in release-5, and in all probability
> > > will not be in release-6 as well. So that concern can be avoided for
> > > this decision. (as Niels stated)
> > >
> > > 2) In the provided mirror links I see release-5 now, so Niels this is
> > > now published? If so we can ask ovirt to move to 5 directly and possibly
> > > the best outcome for this issue
> >
> > Well, I guess so. oVirt does not seem to use the centos-release-gluster*
> > packages, so they can consume the gluster-5 repository just like they do
> > now. Gluster 5 has not been announced on the CentOS lists as the
> > centos-release-gluster* packages still need to be pushed to CentOS
> > Extras (and that will be done when CentOS 7.6 is available).
> >
> >
> Only issue I see with consuming Gluster 5 is that it's not available in
> Fedora 28, so in order to consume it we need either to switch to Fedora 29
> or backport it on Fedora 28

We don't update the versions in Fedora releases. However we do provide
the packages here:
  https://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/5/LATEST/

Can you use that repository?

Yes, thanks
 

Niels


>
>
>
> > Niels
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Shyam
> > >
> > > On 11/27/2018 09:11 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 07:12:30PM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
> > > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:48 PM Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01:15AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > > >>>> According to Sahina we dropped dependency on gluster-gnfs and it's
> > safe to
> > > >>>> move on from the unsupported 3.12 version to a newer one 4.1 / 5.0.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This is for getting an agreement on what we should require in oVirt
> > 4.3:
> > > >>>> CentOS Storage SIG provides bot 4.1 and 5 for x86_64[1] and
> > ppc64le[2]
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> If I understood correctly, 5 is shipping glusterd2 which requires a
> > > >>>> significant effort to get support for while 4.1 is still on
> > glusterd which
> > > >>>> should work with current oVirt code.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Also Gluster 5 still offers the traditional glusterd service.
> > glusterd2
> > > >>> is available for both 4.1 and 5, but it is still an opt-in.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> HTH,
> > > >>> Niels
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> PS: Gluster 5 is not announced for CentOS yet, the
> > > >>>     centos-release-gluster5 package is not yet publicly available
> > > >>
> > > >> I think we should move to latest version, i.e Gluster 5.
> > > >> Niels, is there any ETA for when the package will be available in
> > CentOS?
> > > >
> > > > We're waiting for CentOS 7.6 to be released. After that the updates for
> > > > the SIGs can be pushed again. ETA is not known yet, but Twitter feeds
> > > > from the CentOS developers are positive and may suggest a release in a
> > > > few days?
> > > >
> > > > Niels
> > > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> SANDRO BONAZZOLA
>
> MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV
>
> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> sbonazzo@redhat.com
> <https://red.ht/sig>


--

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV

Red Hat EMEA

sbonazzo@redhat.com