On 1 August 2017 at 14:39, Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 2:34 PM Barak Korren <bkorren@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Test failed: [ 002_bootstrap.add_secondary_storage_domains ] Because it is the only patch participating in the test.
>>
>> Link to suspected patches:
>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/79974
>
>
> This patch adds missing log when resizing an online disk - why do you think
> it is related to the failure?
(The test was equivalent to running the manual job with just this patch)
Then again this may also one of the usual SD testing race conditions.
Since the code in the patch seemed to be related to storage I didn't
want to just assume that.
--
Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel