adding also infra team for visibility on the change in CI.
also inline.

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Francesco Romani <> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Yaniv Bronheim" <>
> To:, "Francesco Romani" <>, "Nir Soffer" <>, "Piotr Kliczewski"
> <>
> Cc: "danken" <>, "David Caro" <>, "Eyal Edri" <>
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 6:46:37 PM
> Subject: Automation CI for vdsm

> We want to allow developers to trigger the script once reviews and
> verification are ready (last step before merge). To do so we agreed to add
> Continues Integration flag for each vdsm patch.

This flag will be called 'Workflow' or we can name it otherwise, we just need to choose what makes sense. 
David/Yaniv - Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Once this flag will be
> signed with +1 it will trigger Jenkins CI to run the check-merged script
> (adding new button to gerrit is not an option - you can image that flag as
> a trigger button), on success Jenkins CI flag will turn to +2. on fail
> we'll get -1 and once new patchset is ready the developer will remove the
> +1 and add it back to the Continues Integration flag to re-trigger the job.
> Please ack the process before we move on with that

Sounds good, even though I'm a little scared (just gut feeling, no evidence
whatsoever) that this could add even more complexity and fragility to the jenkins

In the long run, when this is reliable, it will help greatly.
In the short term, I'm scared because this can lead to false positives and bogus

Let me stress I don't have concrete item to share or specific flaws.

As action item on me, I will find some time next week to check virt functional tests,
to see if they need some fixes, work reliably and so forth

> The patch for those scripts still under review and testing -

Will review asap.

Francesco Romani
RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D
Phone: 8261328
IRC: fromani

Eyal Edri
Supervisor, RHEV CI
EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Red Hat Israel

phone: +972-9-7692018
irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)