On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com> wrote:


On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Martin Perina <mperina@redhat.com> wrote:
As Irit mentioned the provided reproduction steps are wrong (misuse of the code) and she posted correct example showing that jsonrpc code works as expected. So Martin/Simone are you using somewhere in HE code the original example that is misusing the client?

According to
It works in Irit example, at least on that host with that load and timings, setting nr_retries=2 and _timeout=20

While we have _timeout=5 and no custom nr_retries

So I think that we still have to fix it somehow.
Are we really sure that nr_retries=2 and _timeout=20 are really the magic numbers that works on every conditions?

No, it should be tested on HE environment and it depends on your usage.
 

Thanks

Martin


On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Oved Ourfali <oourfali@redhat.com> wrote:
From the latest comment it doesn't seem like a blocker to me.
Martin S. - your thoughts?

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
We have a proposed blocker for the release:
1527155InfravdsmBindings-APIigoihman@redhat.comNEWjsonrpc reconnect logic does not work and gets stuckurgentunspecifiedovirt-4.2.004:30:30

Please review and either approve the blcoker or postpone to 4.2.1.
Thanks,


--

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D

Red Hat EMEA



_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel




--
Martin Perina
Associate Manager, Software Engineering
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.




--

IRIT GOIHMAN

SOFTWARE ENGINEER

EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D

Red Hat EMEA