On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com> wrote:

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken@redhat.com>
> To: "Francesco Romani" <fromani@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Nir Soffer" <nsoffer@redhat.com>, devel@ovirt.org
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 5:11:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] branch ovirt-4.0.5 created
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:30:49AM -0400, Francesco Romani wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > this time I choose to create the ovirt-4.0.5 branch.
> > I already merged some patches for 4.0.6.
> >
> > Unfortunately I branched a bit too early (from last tag :))
> >
> > So patches
> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/65303/1
> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/65304/1
> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/65305/1
> >
> > Should be trivially mergeable - the only thing changed from ovirt-4.0
> > counterpart
> > is the change-id. Please have a quick look just to doublecheck.
>
> Change-Id should be the same for a master patch and all of its backport.
> It seems that it was NOT changed, at least for
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/q/I5cea6ec71c913d74d95317ff7318259d64b40969
> which is a GOOD thing.

Yes, sorry, indeed it is (and indeed it should not change).

> I think we want to enable CI on the new 4.0.5 branch, right? Otherwise
> we'd need to fake the CI+1 flag until 4.0.5 is shipped.

We should, but it is not urgently needed - just regular priority.
For the aforementioned first three patches especially I'm just overly
cautious.

Was CI enabled for 4.0.5 branch?

Adding infra as well.

Shlomi, Did we enabled the regex for stable branch already and we don't need to manually update conf files?

 

--
Francesco Romani
Red Hat Engineering Virtualization R & D
Phone: 8261328
IRC: fromani

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

--

Eyal Edri
Associate Manager

RHV DevOps
EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Red Hat Israel

phone: +972-9-7692018
irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)