If a commit message mention another bug, the CI script try to add the patch

to the bug in the commit message, and change the bug to POST.

Mentioning another bug in a commit message is good practice, making it

easier to follow, and avoiding unclear forms like "bug 1000000" or "BZ#1000000",

or even worse shortened urls like https://goo.gl/bPuFGo.

Does it make sense that we cannot link to Red Hat bugzilla like god

intended?

Here is a proof:

https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/97568/

    gerrit-hooks
    Patch Set 1:

    Check Bug-Url::10000000::WARN, failed to get bug info (private bug or bug doesn't exist
    Check Product::IGNORE, not relevant for branch: master
    Check TM::IGNORE, not relevant for branch: master
    Check Backport::IGNORE, not relevant for branch: master
    Set POST::#10000000::WARN, failed to get bug info (private bug or bug doesn't exist)
    Update Tracker::#10000000::WARN, failed to get bug info (private bug or bug doesn't exist)

    CI scripts should process urls only inside Bug-Url: tag.

Expected behavior:

Extract bug urls *only* from Bug-Url: label.

The same issue exists with Related-To: label.

This is not a new bug. I reported it few years ago but for some reason the issue

was not understood.

Nir

_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list -- infra@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infra-leave@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/infra@ovirt.org/message/YZKHQTISCF6W3GNXOTWWO3IE4T24SZQQ/