On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com> wrote:

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:

We still do not have vdsm-4.30 in http://plain.resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/el7/noarch/ . Since the current version there does not support 4.3 cluster level, we're constantly getting

(EE-ManagedThreadFactory-engineScheduled-Thread-2) [239bce23] EVENT_ID: VDS_CLUSTER_VERSION_NOT_SUPPORTED(154), Host lago-network-suite-master-host-0 is compatible with versions (3.6,4.0,4.1,4.2) and cannot join Cluster Default which is set to version 4.3.

assistance to straighten this up is most welcome.

Isn't a patch to explicitly set the cluster level to 4.2 will solve it?

Y.

​We need to somehow allow https://gerrit.ovirt.org/87116​

 

​ to pass CQ, there was another thread about it yesterday, but no result.

Dafna, AFAIK s390x job was removed, so what else needs to be done for this patch to pass through CQ?

  File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/unittest/case.py", line 369, in run
    testMethod()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/case.py", line 197, in runTest
    self.test(*self.arg)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py", line 129, in wrapped_test
    test()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtlago/testlib.py", line 59, in wrapper
    return func(get_test_prefix(), *args, **kwargs)
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/ovirt-system-tests/upgrade-from-release-suite-master/test-scenarios-after-upgrade/004_basic_sanity.py", line 105, in vm_run
    api.vms.get(VM0_NAME).start(start_params)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk/infrastructure/brokers.py", line 31193, in start
    headers={"Correlation-Id":correlation_id}
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk/infrastructure/proxy.py", line 122, in request
    persistent_auth=self.__persistent_auth
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk/infrastructure/connectionspool.py", line 79, in do_request
    persistent_auth)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirtsdk/infrastructure/connectionspool.py", line 162, in __do_request
    raise errors.RequestError(response_code, response_reason, response_body)
RequestError: 
status: 400
reason: Bad Request
detail:

​

 

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:

2018-02-07 12:58 GMT+01:00 Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com>:

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/07/2018 08:46 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>> With the help of Sandro (many thanks @sbonazzo !), we created minutes
>>> ago the ovirt-4.2 stable branch:
>>>
>>>
>>> Steps performed:
>>>
>>> 1. merged https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/87070/
>>>
>>> 2. branched out ovirt-4.2 from git master
>>>
>>> 3. merged https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/87181/ to add support for 4.3 level
>>>
>>> 4. createed and pushed the tag v4.30.0 from master, to make sure the
>>> version number is greater of the stable versions, and to (somehow :))
>>> align with oVirt versioning
>>>
>>> 5. tested make dist/make rpm on both new branch ovirt-4.2 and master,
>>> both looks good and use the right version
>>>
>>>
>>> Maintainers, please check it looks right for you before merging any new
>>> patch to master branch.
>>>
>>>
>>> Please let me know about any issue!
>> Thank you Francesco (and Sandro).
>>
>> Any idea why http://plain.resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-4.2-snapshot/rpm/el7/noarch/
>> still does not hold any vdsm-4.20 , and
>> http://plain.resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-master-snapshot/rpm/el7/noarch/
>> does not have the new vdsm-4.30 ?
>>
>> ?
>
> Uhm, maybe related to CQ (Change Queue), because git state looks ok, one
> data point:
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_build-artifacts-on-demand-el7-x86_64/772/artifact/exported-artifacts/
> built from this patch https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/87213/
>
> in turn based on top of current master

Maybe Barak knows? Making GQ tick is the intention of the jenkins
patch, isn't it?

I think it may be caused by a failure trying to build on fcraw for s390x. I removed the failing jobs until we fix the issue on jenkins side.

 

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

--

SANDRO BONAZZOLA

ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D

Red Hat EMEA

TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

--

Martin Perina
Associate Manager, Software Engineering
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel