On 4 July 2018 at 08:41, Martin Perina <mperina@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,

I've just checked [1] and [2] repos and ovirt-engine-wildfly*-13 packages are not yet available on those repos. Any luck with passing those packages through CQ?

Unfortunately an unrelated regressions caused the dependent changes to end up in different batches during the bisection search, and they were dropped again.

Here is finally a test running with the two of them together and nothing else:
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/8563/

 

Thanks

Martin



On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Barak Korren <bkorren@redhat.com> wrote:


On 3 July 2018 at 12:26, Martin Perina <mperina@redhat.com> wrote:


On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Ehud Yonasi <eyonasi@redhat.com> wrote:
Suspected patch:

Link to job:

Link to all logs:

Relevant error snippet:
Error: ovirt-engine-wildfly-overlay conflicts with ovirt-engine-wildfly-13.0.0-1.el7.x86_64

​OK​, I thought that I can do stepped approach:

1. Push ovirt-engine-wildfly-13 RPM into the repos
2. Push ovirt-engine-wildfly-overlay-13 RPM, which requires ovirt-engine-wildfly-13, into repos

But it seems that due to serial nature of our CQ it's not possible, so can we pass both patches [1] and [2] though CQ at once?


Ehud will handle pushing them through the CQ together (its a matter of timing things so they both get added to the CQ while it is busy with other things).

I wonder - could we merge those projects together to avoid this situation in the future? What is the relationship between 'ovirt-engine-wildfly' and the Wildfly upstream?
 



--
Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted



--
Martin Perina
Associate Manager, Software Engineering
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.



--
Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted