On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Perina <mperina@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I told
>>> Sandro that it is his call.
>>> I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this permutation
>>> should be excluded so I have abandon my patch.
>>>
>>> Thanks all
>>> Gil
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoihman@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/vdsm/vdsm_standard.yaml
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only
>>>> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since fc24
>>>> will also be EOL in a few months time.
>>
>>
>> As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it cannot be
>> used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ...
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075
>

>
>
> Dan, Eyal, please reach a fedora version usable status.
> Either we move to fc25 (or later) or we stay to fc24, but we need CI to be
> able to build and run it.
> We can't leave CI broken.

I don't think we have a choice, we must stay with fc24 for now, and fix the
automation packages.

>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> adding Sandro
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to Sandro, there was no official statement about moving
>>>>>> master to fc25.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Irit
>>>>>> Gil
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> May I ask why was
>>>>>>> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/vdsm_master_build-artifacts-fc24-x86_64/
>>>>>>> added yesterday? Who needs f24 builds of vdsm master?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:28 PM, Irit Goihman <igoihman@redhat.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> > It seems like patch https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69846/ didn't add
>>>>>>> > python-dateutil package to fc24 build artifacts job.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/71208/ should fix it.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Gil Shinar <gshinar@redhat.com>
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Hi,
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> $subject job fails with the following exception:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> 16:19:32 make[2]: Entering directory
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> '/home/jenkins/workspace/vdsm_master_build-artifacts-fc24-x86_64/vdsm/lib/api'
>>>>>>> >> 16:19:32   Generate vdsm-api.html
>>>>>>> >> 16:19:32 chmod u+w
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Irit Goihman
>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>> Red Hat Israel Ltd.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Devel mailing list
>>>>> Devel@ovirt.org
>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Eyal Edri
>>>> Associate Manager
>>>> RHV DevOps
>>>> EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
>>>> Red Hat Israel
>>>>
>>>> phone: +972-9-7692018
>>>> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Devel mailing list
>>> Devel@ovirt.org
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel@ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sandro Bonazzola
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> See how it works at redhat.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel