Thanks for reviewing the proposal.:)

I was not sure if significant changes need to be done in UI that’s why I haven't
mentioned that in my proposal.But I will discuss about that with Maor and if it
is needed then I will also include that.


On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Greg Sheremeta <> wrote:
Nice job, Shubham :) I added some suggestions to your document.

Do you have any plans for UI changes? In your examples, I only saw REST API calls.

Best wishes,

On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 4:38 AM, shubham dubey <> wrote:
since it was written in the docs that shrinking drive is not supported yet hence I have decided to work on that.But if it is
already supported in 4.1v then I think I need to remove them from my proposal.:).


On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Maor Lipchuk <> wrote:
Hi Shubham,

The proposal looks very impressive, good job!

I got a question regarding what you mentioned about the "Online
Virtual Drive Resize" feature.
Did you refer to the ovirt sparsify feature:

or the online-virtual-drive-resize feature:

both should be supported in oVirt 4.1 IINM

Regarding the synopsis section which you mentioned the supported types
of storage domains, please also add Ceph as part of the block Storage
Domains. oVirt 3.6 should supports it through Cinder.


On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:12 AM, shubham dubey <> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have created the draft proposal recently on Configuring backup storage in
> ovirt.Here is the link to view
> Any suggestion or comments are welcome.
> Thanks,
> Shubham Dubey

Devel mailing list

Greg Sheremeta, MBA
Red Hat, Inc.
Sr. Software Engineer