Greg,

I'm sorry about that, I forgot to send official announcement about that.

I will do that asap.

Martin


On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Greg Sheremeta <gshereme@redhat.com> wrote:


On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Greg Sheremeta <gshereme@redhat.com> wrote:
I can't start latest master engine (just fetched) with the same error

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/share/ovirt-engine/services/ovirt-engine/ovirt-engine.py", line 32, in <module>
    from ovirt_engine import service
  File "/home/greg/ovirt-engine/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ovirt_engine/service.py", line 35, in <module>
    from dateutil import tz
ImportError: No module named dateutil

Fixed with a simple 'sudo dnf install python-dateutil'
 


On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Perina <mperina@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I told
>>> Sandro that it is his call.
>>> I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this permutation
>>> should be excluded so I have abandon my patch.
>>>
>>> Thanks all
>>> Gil
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoihman@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/vdsm/vdsm_standard.yaml
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only
>>>> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since fc24
>>>> will also be EOL in a few months time.
>>
>>
>> As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it cannot be
>> used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ...
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075
>
>
>
> Dan, Eyal, please reach a fedora version usable status.
> Either we move to fc25 (or later) or we stay to fc24, but we need CI to be
> able to build and run it.
> We can't leave CI broken.

Which CI job is broken with f25?
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



--
Greg Sheremeta, MBA
Red Hat, Inc.
Sr. Software Engineer
gshereme@redhat.com



--
Greg Sheremeta, MBA
Red Hat, Inc.
Sr. Software Engineer
gshereme@redhat.com

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel