On 15 October 2017 at 19:43, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:

Down sides are waste of resources, slower CI responsiveness, and more
importantly: rawhide fragility may cause more unrelated failures.

I don't think it will be that much of a resource issue. Our non-peak slave utilization is pretty low. And you can just remove some of the older Fedora versions.

I suggest not to make too many premature assumptions. If rawhide testing is useful for you, just add it and see how it behaves over time...

Nir, with your experience - does it worth it?

How about having "rawhide" as non-voting?

You can accomplish that easily - just add a 'check-patch.sh.fcraw' script that would source the normal 'check-patch.sh' and throw away the process return value.

Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted