On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Meital Avital <mavital@redhat.com> wrote:Nikolai succeed to reproduce the issue on the clean env,That's not a precise reproduction, as Nikolai writes in comment 15 "It looks like different now."
please see comments in Bug 1525907 - VDSM is in recovery mode after a restart in fresh installation.
Meital.On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Meital Avital <mavital@redhat.com> wrote:Adding Ying to get her statusOn Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Meital Avital <mavital@redhat.com> wrote:Update:
Deployment with iSCSI succeedOn Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Meital Avital <mavital@redhat.com> wrote:Hi All,The status of old HE deploy for today is:Deployment with NFS succeed
Deployment with Gluster succeedArtyom testing HE deployment with iSCSI - in progressAccording to this BZ1525907 - Nikolai trying again to deploy HE on the same host on clean env - we think that this issue related to those host, this is what we are trying to understand.I don't have the results yet, soon I will have them and I will update this thread.Thanks,Meital.On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com> wrote:On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:2017-12-18 8:37 GMT+01:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>:2017-12-18 8:29 GMT+01:00 Dan Kenigsberg <danken@redhat.com>:On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:Hi,we just need to rebuild VDSM to complete the acknowledged blockers.We still have a proposed blocker in NEW state according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=flag% 3Ablocker%3F%20target_mileston e%3Aovirt-4.2.0%20status%3Anew %2Cassigned%2Cpost%2Cmodified
1525907 Storage vdsm General danken@redhat.com NEW VDSM is in recovery mode after a restart in fresh install... urgent urgent ovirt-4.2.0 Sat 18:12 Dan, please review, let us know if we have to block on this or if we can postpone to 4.2.1.I don't think it is for me to review.The bug is very confusing and sparse in information, but it seems to claim that self-hosted engine is not deployable. I think that it is for Simone to reply to that claim. Is it true? When? Do you think, like Adam, that this is a problem of host connectivity to its storage?Adam, Nir, Tal, Allon, can you please review?Any update?+Meital.