On 16 December 2017 at 00:53, Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:30 PM Barak Korren <bkorren@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi to all project maintainers,
>>
>> As you may know, over the last few months the oVirt project had got
>> some code contributions geared towards enabling the use of s390x
>> (Mainframe) machines as hypervisor hosts.
>>
>> As you may also know, if you've followed the relevant thread, some
>> work had been done in collaboration with the Fedora community to
>> enable os390x support in oVirt`s CI system.
>>
>> We're now at the point where we can take the final step and enable
>> automated builds of node components for s390x/fc27. Looking at what we
>> curently build for ppc64le, I already took the time and submitted
>> patches to enable build jobs for vdsm [2], ovirt-host [3], and
>> ioprocess [4]. The relevant maintainers should have had these patches
>> land in thair inbpx already.
>>
>> Few questions remain however:
>> 1. When would be the best time to merge the patches mentioned above? Given
>>    that some of the projects do not support fc27 yet, that the new
>> build jobs may
>>    raise issues and that the 4.2 release is fast approaching, the
>> right timing should
>>    be considered carefully.
>
>
> We should prepare a fedora 27 build for all projects before we enable
> the jobs in the CI. But if we can disable problematic jobs in the CI easily
> (and it seems we can), I think this is not a problem.

I don't want to have the code in 'master' diverge from what actually
exists in jenkins.

> You can merge the ioprocess change now if you like.

Maybe its better to make sure fc27/x86_64 builds first? Please state
your intent on the relevant patch.

>> 2. Which additional projects need to be build? I can see we build some SDK
>>    components for ppc64le as wel, are those dependences of vdsm? Will we
>> need
>>    to build then for s390x?
>
>
> For vdsm we need:
> - ioprocess (nsoffer)
> - ovirt-imageio-daemon (derez)
> - ovirt-imageio-common (derez)
> - pthreading (ybronhei)
> - subprocess32 (sbonazzo?)

I wonder how come the last 4 don't have ppc64le builds.

The last 2
don't seem to even have proper build jobs.

> For engine:

AFAIK there is no intention to support running engine on anything
other then x86_64 at this point.

> This is only (some) the components that we build. We have also tons of
> dependencies that are part of Fedora (e.g. sanlock, libvirt). I hope these
> projects are built for s390x.

There is a full fedora build for s390x, so I suppose those are available there.
Also, those are all mentioned in vdsm.spec right? So build-artifacts
will not pass if they are missing right?

--
Barak Korren
RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi
Red Hat EMEA
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted