On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Martin Perina <mperina@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Gil Shinar <gshinar@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Eyal, I have tried to reach you last evening with no success so I told
>>> Sandro that it is his call.
>>> I've talked with Danken this morning and he said that this permutation
>>> should be excluded so I have abandon my patch.
>>>
>>> Thanks all
>>> Gil
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Irit Goihman <igoihman@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I see fc24 was excluded from master jobs:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/69233/10/jobs/confs/projects/vdsm/vdsm_standard.yaml
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think at the time of the patch there was agreement we build only
>>>> latest fedora, so 25 instead of 24.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, its up to the maintainer, but I vote to build fc25 since fc24
>>>> will also be EOL in a few months time.
>>
>>
>> As I said in different thread VDSM can be built for FC25, but it cannot be
>> used [1]. So FC24 is the latest usable version ...
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414075
>
>
>
> Dan, Eyal, please reach a fedora version usable status.
> Either we move to fc25 (or later) or we stay to fc24, but we need CI to be
> able to build and run it.
> We can't leave CI broken.

Which CI job is broken with f25?

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel