Thank you Greg and Martin.
That makes a clear sense.
I will apply this interpretation to my translation.

Kind regards,

Yuko

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Martin Sivak <msivak@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,

the affinity groups allow defining VM to host affinity rules. This
error is shown when the same pair of host and VM has both positive and
negative affinity rule defined. Both host and VM are specified by the
user, but not necessarily directly as there can be a conflict chain
like this: A + B, B + C, A - C (plus is positive affinity, minus is
negative).

Best regards

Martin Sivak

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Greg Sheremeta <gshereme@redhat.com> wrote:
> Phillip might know
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Yuko Katabami <ykatabam@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Re-posting.
>> Could anyone help us with this?
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Yuko Katabami <ykatabam@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello oVirt developers.
>>> I have started translating Admin Portal strings for 4.2 from today and
>>> here is my first question.
>>>
>>>
>>> File: AppErrors
>>> Resource ID: ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_AFFINITY_HOSTS_RULES_COLLISION
>>>
>>> String: The following affinity groups, containing the indicated hosts and
>>> VMs, have VM to host conflicts between positive and negative enforcing
>>> affinity groups.
>>>
>>> Question: Does "the indicated hosts and VMs" mean the hosts and VMs
>>> specified by user? Could you please also explain what "VM to host conflicts"
>>> mean?
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> Yuko
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devel mailing list
>> Devel@ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel