[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1649?page= ]com.atlassian.jira.plugin. system.issuetabpanels:comment- tabpanel&focusedCommentId= 34913#comment-34913 eyal edri commented on OVIRT-1649:
We are planning to start commenting directly in Gerrit on the relevant offending patch soon, we were waiting to see how CQ behaves and sending emails to infra only until now. However, it looks like it's quite accurate, so we might consider doing it sooner, though we might also want to wait until we gate also OS changes before during that.
Nevertheless, I guess we can in the meantime include the patch owner in the βtoβ email when sending a report. Any comments on the current summary? is there something missing in it other than the patch owner?
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:11 PM, danken (oVirt JIRA) <
β
Eyal edri
ASSOCIATE MANAGER
RHV DevOps
EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D
Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted> phone: +972-9-7692018 irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
Include summary, owner and component of suspected patch in OST Failure Report
Key: OVIRT-1649 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1649 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy Issue Type: By-EMAIL Reporter: danken Assignee: infra$subject would make it easier and quicker to check if the suspicion is correct.
β This message was sent by Atlassian {0} (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100059)
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra