On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Yedidyah Bar David <didi@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:
> Maybe we should change the logic on moving bugs to MODIFIED,
> Now that we moved to the version branch.
>
> Tal - any thoughts on a logic that SHOULD move bugs to MODIFIED that we'll
> be sure its OK?

Repeating myself from a previous discussion: I think we should never move
bugs from POST to MODIFIED. Only a developer can know if it's indeed ready,
or another patch is still needed but was not yet pushed. I think it's safer
to miss bugs left on POST although they could have been moved to MODIFIED,
than the opposite - move to MODIFIED bugs that actually require more work.


You're optimistic that bugs will not stay on POST, we've done it in the past.
This has a bigger risk of bugs getting left behind on POST and increasing the amount of 
bugs that are not verified on time.

Its the easiest solution to drop this bot, but i belive it will do more damage than good.
 
>
> e.
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tal Nisan <tnisan@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> After merging a patch for a 3.6.3 bug on the ovirt-engine-3.6 branch the
>> bug is moved to MODIFIED, since the 3.6.3 branch was opened yesterday the
>> bug should stay in POST until merged in ovirt-engine-3.6.3 branch as well
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Infra mailing list
>> Infra@ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Eyal Edri
> Associate Manager
> EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
> Red Hat Israel
>
> phone: +972-9-7692018
> irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Infra mailing list
> Infra@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
>



--
Didi



--
Eyal Edri
Associate Manager
EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D
Red Hat Israel

phone: +972-9-7692018
irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)