[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=35441#comment-35441 ]
Ok, I get the issue now – I think long term it would be easier to maintain our own container images with specific browser versions then our own RPM packages. Its just a little challenge to get the same caching behaviour we have for RPMs for containers.
I just discussed the details about how to go about thing this with [~gbenhaim@redhat.com] and [~dbelenky@redhat.com], some small changes will be needed in OST and our CI cleanup code to enable this, but its certainly doable.
Guys, please fill in the details of what we've discussed here.
new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite — need multiple firefoxes and chromium
Key: OVIRT-1788 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1788 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy Issue Type: Improvement Components: OST Reporter: Greg Sheremeta Assignee: infraI'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things look good, make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually add chromium, which can run headless now too. The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test machine, along with chromium. There are also some binary components required, geckodriver and chromedriver. These are not packaged. Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56, /opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes sense to maintain a custom rpm with all of this. Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want to avoid copr.)
— This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100074)