[ https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=36614#comment-36614 ]
[~pkliczew@redhat.com] since this issue only happened with vdsm-jsonrpc-java AFAIK, due to its tight integration with engine, How often would you say such issue happens? can we allow for a delay between version bumps patches of the project to try and avoid it until we implement a permenant solution?
Gerrit patches can reach CQ out-of-order
Key: OVIRT-1759 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1759 Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy Issue Type: Bug Components: Change Queue, Gerrit/git Reporter: Barak Korren Assignee: infra Priority: High Labels: change-queue, gerritIs seems that despite the fact that all the jobs involved were designed to preserve proper patch ordering, there can be cases where patches trigger Jenkins jobs in the wrong order, which in turn end up putting the patches in the wrong order into the CQ. This in turn, causes the CQ to fail accurately detecting the patches that cause issues. Here is en example of such an occurance. The following patches were merged in the order specified below: # https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/83917 # https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/83918 # https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/83919 # https://gerrit.ovirt.org/c/83920 The standard-enqueue runs putting them in the CQ however, seem to have run in a different order: # http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/standard-enqueue/6712/ (83 917) # http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/standard-enqueue/6713/ (83919) # http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/standard-enqueue/6714/ (83920) # http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/standard-enqueue/6715/ (83918) This resulted in CQ ‘add’ command running in the wrong order: # http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue/12200/ (add 83917) # http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue/12201/ (add 83919) # http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue/12202/ (add 83920) # http ://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue/12203/ (add 83918) We need to come up with a way to make the system properly preserver order.
— This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100085)