On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 8:32 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
I am starting to see master jobs passing so it seems the issue is resolved
https://jenkins.ovirt.org/view/Change%20queue%20jobs/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 5:54 PM Eyal Edri <eedri@redhat.com> wrote:I'm back at the office tomorrow, let me know if anything else else is needed.On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, 17:34 Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:I re-triggered latest changes from failed projects and will update once I see results.thanks,DafnaOn Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:sandro was away for a few days. maybe eyal or Rafael Martins can help with the tagging issueOn Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:49 AM Galit Rosenthal <grosenth@redhat.com> wrote:Any updates, still failing?On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 6:49 PM Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:adding sandronOn Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:46 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
> my patch is installing correct dpdk from extras but using openvswitch2.9 and
> not 2.10
> is that package bump merged?
No; ovs-2.10 (the build located at [0]) will need to be tagged.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:52 PM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso
> <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
>> > I added dpdk to the 4.2 repo as well which should solve the issue in
>> > upgrade
>> > I do see that http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/
>> > has
>> > both dpdk-16.11.2-4.el7.x86_64.rpm and dpdk-17.11-7.el7.x86_64.rpm so
>> > hope
>> > it would grab the correct one.
>> >
>>
>> I have only tested it w/ dpdk-17.11-13.el7.x86_64 - and that works.
>> That's also in extras, and from my understanding in should push the
>> latest one available.
>>
>> Fingers crossed.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM Miguel Duarte de Mora Barroso
>> > <mdbarroso@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Dafna Ron <dron@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > We have a failure in upgrade suite.
>> >> > Issue is due to openvswitch failing to install due to dpdk deps.
>> >> > it seems that even after we add the missing package there are some
>> >> > issues
>> >> > with dependencies.
>> >> >
>> >> > I see that Miguel has a patch for that as well - Miguel, can you
>> >> > please
>> >> > update on the issue?
>> >> >
>> >> > full log is here;
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/10643/artifact/upgrade-from-release-suite.el7.x86_64/test_logs/upgrade-from-release-suite-master/post-002_bootstrap.py/
>> >> >
>> >> > My patch which continues to fail after adding the packge:
>> >> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95015/
>> >> >
>> >> > error for jobs: https://pastebin.com/CfLTRe5R
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Dafna
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I am quite probably the culprit of this entire ordeal.
>> >>
>> >> To use openvswitch 2.10 - [0] - , we need the latest dpdk libraries,
>> >> which are available on the centos *extra* repo.
>> >>
>> >> Following Alan Pevec's advice I told Sandro to untag the current
>> >> version of dpdk, which would - from what I understood - get us dpdk
>> >> from *extras*. Patch [1] does that.
>> >>
>> >> Now, thing is, that it works for openvswitch 2.10, not openvswitch 2.9
>> >> - which is what we're shipping in 4.2.7, and is being pulled in the
>> >> failed OST run. I also think it failed even after your patch because
>> >> it attempts to retrieve dpdk from the centos *base* repo, not the
>> >> *extras*.
>> >>
>> >> Build [2] is an OST execution of the basic suite, using ovs-2.10 with
>> >> its dpdk dependency, which passed successfully.
>> >>
>> >> Build [3] is an OST execution of the upgrade suite, using ovs-2.10
>> >> with its dpdk dependency. It failed, but, from the host yum.log - at
>> >> [4], it seems the issue you described above is fixed.
>> >>
>> >> I think that there are 2 courses of action depending on what we want to
>> >> deliver:
>> >> ovs-2.9 - re-tag the old DPDK version in the virt sig
>> >> ovs-2.10 - tag build [1], and get the DPDK dependencies from centos
>> >> extra packages
@Sandro: your thoughts on this? For 4.3 I think the best is to bump
the ovs version
>> >>
>> >> [0] - https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24364
>> >> [1] - https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/95014/
>> >> [2] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3389/
>> >> [3] - https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/
>> >> [4] -
>> >>
>> >> https://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-system-tests_manual/3390/artifact/exported-artifacts/test_logs/upgrade-from-release-suite-master/post-002_bootstrap.py/lago-upgrade-from-release-suite-master-host-0/_var_log/yum.log
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
--
