We are planning to start commenting directly in Gerrit on the relevant offending patch soon, we were waiting to see how CQ behaves and sending emails to infra only until now.

However, it looks like it's quite accurate, so we might consider doing it sooner, though we might also want to wait until we gate also OS changes before during that.

Nevertheless, I guess we can in the meantime include the patch owner in the 'to' email when sending a report.

Any comments on the current summary? is there something missing in it other than the patch owner?

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:11 PM, danken (oVirt JIRA) <jira@ovirt-jira.atlassian.net> wrote:

danken created OVIRT-1649:
   Summary: Include summary, owner and component of suspected patch in OST Failure Report
       Key: OVIRT-1649
       URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1649
   Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
Issue Type: By-EMAIL
  Reporter: danken
  Assignee: infra
$subject would make it easier and quicker to check if the suspicion is correct.

— This message was sent by Atlassian {0} (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100059)
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

--

Eyal edri

ASSOCIATE MANAGER

RHV DevOps

EMEA VIRTUALIZATION R&D

TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.

phone: +972-9-7692018
irc: eedri (on #tlv #rhev-dev #rhev-integ)