On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Barak Korren <email@example.com> wrote:On 25 June 2017 at 09:38, Eyal Edri <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Barak Korren <email@example.com> wrote:בתאריך 23 ביוני 2017 15:56, "Sandro Bonazzola" <firstname.lastname@example.org> כתב:Hi,we dropped publishing vdsm ppc64le builds on snapshot repos due to issues keeping aligned nvr between x86_64 and ppc64le.Today we're still missing ppc64le builds on http://resources.ovirt.org/pub
/ovirt-4.1-snapshot/rpm/el7/pp c64le/Where do we stand with the support for the build of the same nvr ob both arches?Can we get it re-enabled?Yes. We solved the issues we had with this a while ago with the new deploy-to-expetimental job. Are you sure the ppc64le builds are not making it to 'tested'? (Im assuming the builds themselves are enabled...)I suppose the situation with 4.1 is a little different because it is not taking stuff from 'tested' yet...Sent , which should solve it.Barak, the fact that we still publish nightly to 4.1 in the old way can somehow still cause issues for publishing both ppc64le and x86_64?The only thing I can think of is if for a very slim chance, one of the builds of vdsm is running during the time publisher works resulting in a mismatch in the repo, right?Yeah, not very probable.Maybe we should just clean up the publishers and move 4.1 to use 'tested' too. Do we have a ticket about that?But I don't see a good reason to push it forward unless we hit a problem or blocker, it might cause issues like we've seen in master and alsothere is a good chance 4.1 still has old non-standard CI projects that will make it impossible to finish, unless we migrate them to standard CI (which also might not be worth the effort).Bottom line, good to have a ticket on it, we'll do if we see its needed at some point.