On 03/08 18:53, Barak Korren wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 18:25, Eric Helms <ehelms@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I am thinking about how to make this more useful to the masses on the team.
> > The question I am asking myself is "can it replace vagrant for some
> > scenarios". For example, being able to spin up a Satellite + Capsule(s) with
> > DHCP, DNS etc. but allow outside access to the server via a web browser.
> > Since often the setup requires a beefy box that is running on a beaker
> > machine or server under a desk and developers use their laptops to access.
> >
> Faced with the same dilemma when running oVirt on Lago on my MiniDell,
> I've simply setup Apache on it to proxy HTTP traffic into the VM
> network.
> With a browser proxy plugin such as foxy proxy configured to make the
> browser also resolve DNS for domains with certain suffixes over the
> proxy, I've got a pretty seamless user experience without giving up on
> the environment isolation.
>
> If you want this to be self-contained in a script you give developers,
> you can perhaps use the Ruby or Python built-in HTTP servers to do the
> proxying.


I think that a better solution might be exposing ports or similar, though I
agree that having the possibility to setup external nets is a nice to have.

btw. you can use ssh's -D option to setup a socks proxy server too, simpler
imo.

>
>
>
> --
> Barak Korren
> bkorren@redhat.com
> RHEV-CI Team
> _______________________________________________
> lago-devel mailing list
> lago-devel@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/lago-devel

--
David Caro

Red Hat S.L.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization R&D

Tel.: +420 532 294 605
Email: dcaro@redhat.com
IRC: dcaro|dcaroest@{freenode|oftc|redhat}
Web: www.redhat.com
RHT Global #: 82-62605