From blanchet at abes.fr Tue Nov 25 05:38:39 2014
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7505493605333699620=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: =?utf-8?q?Nathana=C3=ABl_Blanchet_=3Cblanchet_at_abes=2Efr=3E?=
To: users at ovirt.org
Subject: [ovirt-users] engine poller/satellite functionment?
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:38:29 +0100
Message-ID: <54745C25.4070804@abes.fr>
--===============7505493605333699620==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060301090009090400070906
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dutf-8; format=3Dflowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi all,
I already manage a first engine and I'm about to deploy a second engine =
to an other site.
I have thought about several possibilities:
* create a new independant engine on the future site
* create a second datacenter in the first engine so that all my vms
are aggregated in a same place and contact hosts with public
addresses (hum...) or via a vpn.
* the last one is a question : like centreon does with monitoring, is
there a way to use the first engine as a master (or central) and the
second or many other ones as poller/satellite which are supposed to
deal locally with hosts?
This architecture is interesting because the workload is reparted
between several engines and once link is needed between poller and
central. More, all my vms are shown in the same ui.
Can someone give me his point of view about this?
Thank you.
--------------060301090009090400070906
Content-Type: text/html; charset=3Dutf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi all,
I already manage a first engine and I'm about to deploy a second
engine to an other site.
I have thought about several possibilities:
- create a new independant engine on the future site
- create a second datacenter in the first engine so that all my
vms are aggregated in a same place and contact hosts with public
addresses (hum...) or via a vpn.
- the last one is a question : like centreon does with
monitoring, is there a way to use the first engine as a master
(or central) and the second or many other ones as
poller/satellite which are supposed to deal locally with hosts?
This architecture is interesting because the workload is
reparted between several engines and once link is needed between
poller and central. More, all my vms are shown in the same ui.
Can someone give me his point of view about this?
Thank you.
--------------060301090009090400070906--
--===============7505493605333699620==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="attachment.bin"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--===============7505493605333699620==--
From iheim at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 12:47:45 2014
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0293952184471489877=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Itamar Heim
To: users at ovirt.org
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] engine poller/satellite functionment?
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:18:54 -0500
Message-ID: <548AF94E.9050308@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: 54745C25.4070804@abes.fr
--===============0293952184471489877==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 11/25/2014 05:38 AM, Nathana=C3=ABl Blanchet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I already manage a first engine and I'm about to deploy a second engine
> to an other site.
> I have thought about several possibilities:
>
> * create a new independant engine on the future site
> * create a second datacenter in the first engine so that all my vms
> are aggregated in a same place and contact hosts with public
> addresses (hum...) or via a vpn.
> * the last one is a question : like centreon does with monitoring, is
> there a way to use the first engine as a master (or central) and the
> second or many other ones as poller/satellite which are supposed to
> deal locally with hosts?
> This architecture is interesting because the workload is reparted
> between several engines and once link is needed between poller and
> central. More, all my vms are shown in the same ui.
>
> Can someone give me his point of view about this?
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
no nesting of engines. you can manage a remote cluster from a single =
engine, or deploy 2 engines.
take a look at ManageIQ for orchestrating/monitoring across multiple =
engines.
--===============0293952184471489877==--