From carlos.garcia at f-integra.org Fri Sep 23 05:57:06 2016 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7534308228338392582==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?utf-8?q?Carlos_Garc=C3=ADa_G=C3=B3mez_=3Ccarlos=2Egarcia_at_f-integra?= =?utf-8?q?=2Eorg=3E?= To: users at ovirt.org Subject: [ovirt-users] Ovirt Nodes - Which OS Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:50:05 +0200 Message-ID: <2AD637F6252A40DAAB414EECAB2EDB1D@fintegra.org> --===============7534308228338392582== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =C3=89ste es un mensaje de varias partes en formato MIME. ------=3D_NextPart_000_11C7_01D21590.A03DE310 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I was testing Ovirt inside a VDI proyect. Now, I know there is new version of Ovrit (4.X) and VDI Software so I =3D have decided to remake the installation of all. I wonder which is the best OS platafform for the Host (Ovirt - Nodes). =3D (Fedora / Red Hat Enterprise Linux / CentOS) Now I have CentOS 7 64Bit =3D but... I am not sure. What do you think about it? Fedora or CentOS? Which version? Fedora 19? Fedora 24? CentOS 6? CentOS 7? I always had the feeling that Fedora is a little ahead against CentOS =3D for example oVirt packages. Thank you Regards, Carlos ------=3D_NextPart_000_11C7_01D21590.A03DE310 Content-Type: text/html; charset=3D"iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
 
I was testing  Ovirt inside a VDI proyect.
Now, I know there is new version of Ovrit (4.X) and VDI Software so = =3D I have=3D20 decided to remake the installation of all.
 
I wonder which is the best OS platafform for the Host =3D (Ovirt -=3D20 Nodes). (Fedora / Red Hat Enterprise Linux / CentOS) Now I have = =3D CentOS=3D20 7 64Bit but... I am not sure.
 
What do you think about it? Fedora or CentOS?
Which version? Fedora 19? Fedora 24? CentOS 6? CentOS 7?
 
I always had the feeling that Fedora is a little ahead against =3D CentOS for=3D20 example oVirt packages.
 
Thank  you
 
Regards,
 
Carlos
 
 
 
------=3D_NextPart_000_11C7_01D21590.A03DE310-- --===============7534308228338392582== Content-Type: multipart/alternative MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="attachment.bin" yXN0ZSBlcyB1biBtZW5zYWplIGRlIHZhcmlhcyBwYXJ0ZXMgZW4gZm9ybWF0byBNSU1FLgotLS0t LS09X05leHRQYXJ0XzAwMF8xMUM3XzAxRDIxNTkwLkEwM0RFMzEwCkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZTogdGV4 dC9wbGFpbjsKCWNoYXJzZXQ9Imlzby04ODU5LTEiCkNvbnRlbnQtVHJhbnNmZXItRW5jb2Rpbmc6 IHF1b3RlZC1wcmludGFibGUKCkhlbGxvLAoKSSB3YXMgdGVzdGluZyAgT3ZpcnQgaW5zaWRlIGEg VkRJIHByb3llY3QuCk5vdywgSSBrbm93IHRoZXJlIGlzIG5ldyB2ZXJzaW9uIG9mIE92cml0ICg0 LlgpIGFuZCBWREkgU29mdHdhcmUgc28gSSA9CmhhdmUgZGVjaWRlZCB0byByZW1ha2UgdGhlIGlu c3RhbGxhdGlvbiBvZiBhbGwuCgpJIHdvbmRlciB3aGljaCBpcyB0aGUgYmVzdCBPUyBwbGF0YWZm b3JtIGZvciB0aGUgSG9zdCAoT3ZpcnQgLSBOb2RlcykuID0KKEZlZG9yYSAvIFJlZCBIYXQgRW50 ZXJwcmlzZSBMaW51eCAvIENlbnRPUykgTm93IEkgaGF2ZSBDZW50T1MgNyA2NEJpdCA9CmJ1dC4u LiBJIGFtIG5vdCBzdXJlLgoKV2hhdCBkbyB5b3UgdGhpbmsgYWJvdXQgaXQ/IEZlZG9yYSBvciBD ZW50T1M/CldoaWNoIHZlcnNpb24/IEZlZG9yYSAxOT8gRmVkb3JhIDI0PyBDZW50T1MgNj8gQ2Vu dE9TIDc/CgpJIGFsd2F5cyBoYWQgdGhlIGZlZWxpbmcgdGhhdCBGZWRvcmEgaXMgYSBsaXR0bGUg YWhlYWQgYWdhaW5zdCBDZW50T1MgPQpmb3IgZXhhbXBsZSBvVmlydCBwYWNrYWdlcy4KClRoYW5r ICB5b3UKClJlZ2FyZHMsCgpDYXJsb3MKCgoKLS0tLS0tPV9OZXh0UGFydF8wMDBfMTFDN18wMUQy MTU5MC5BMDNERTMxMApDb250ZW50LVR5cGU6IHRleHQvaHRtbDsKCWNoYXJzZXQ9Imlzby04ODU5 LTEiCkNvbnRlbnQtVHJhbnNmZXItRW5jb2Rpbmc6IHF1b3RlZC1wcmludGFibGUKCjxIVE1MPjxI RUFEPjwvSEVBRD4KPEJPRFkgZGlyPTNEbHRyPgo8RElWIGRpcj0zRGx0cj4KPERJViBzdHlsZT0z RCJGT05ULVNJWkU6IDEycHQ7IEZPTlQtRkFNSUxZOiAnQ2FsaWJyaSc7IENPTE9SOiAjMDAwMDAw Ij4KPERJVj5IZWxsbyw8L0RJVj4KPERJVj4mbmJzcDs8L0RJVj4KPERJVj5JIHdhcyB0ZXN0aW5n Jm5ic3A7IE92aXJ0IGluc2lkZSBhIFZESSBwcm95ZWN0LjwvRElWPgo8RElWPk5vdywgSSBrbm93 IHRoZXJlIGlzIG5ldyB2ZXJzaW9uIG9mIE92cml0ICg0LlgpIGFuZCBWREkgU29mdHdhcmUgc28g PQpJIGhhdmU9MjAKZGVjaWRlZCB0byByZW1ha2UgdGhlIGluc3RhbGxhdGlvbiBvZiBhbGwuPC9E SVY+CjxESVY+Jm5ic3A7PC9ESVY+CjxESVY+SSB3b25kZXIgd2hpY2ggaXMgdGhlIGJlc3QgT1Mg cGxhdGFmZm9ybSBmb3IgdGhlIDxTVFJPTkc+SG9zdCA9CihPdmlydCAtPTIwCk5vZGVzKTwvU1RS T05HPi4gKEZlZG9yYSAvIFJlZCBIYXQgRW50ZXJwcmlzZSBMaW51eCAvIENlbnRPUykgTm93IEkg aGF2ZSA9CkNlbnRPUz0yMAo3IDY0Qml0IGJ1dC4uLiBJIGFtIG5vdCBzdXJlLjwvRElWPgo8RElW PiZuYnNwOzwvRElWPgo8RElWPldoYXQgZG8geW91IHRoaW5rIGFib3V0IGl0PyBGZWRvcmEgb3Ig Q2VudE9TPzwvRElWPgo8RElWPldoaWNoIHZlcnNpb24/IEZlZG9yYSAxOT8gRmVkb3JhIDI0PyBD ZW50T1MgNj8gQ2VudE9TIDc/PC9ESVY+CjxESVY+Jm5ic3A7PC9ESVY+CjxESVY+SSBhbHdheXMg aGFkIHRoZSBmZWVsaW5nIHRoYXQgRmVkb3JhIGlzIGEgbGl0dGxlIGFoZWFkIGFnYWluc3QgPQpD ZW50T1MgZm9yPTIwCmV4YW1wbGUgb1ZpcnQgcGFja2FnZXMuPC9ESVY+CjxESVY+Jm5ic3A7PC9E SVY+CjxESVY+VGhhbmsmbmJzcDsgeW91PC9ESVY+CjxESVY+Jm5ic3A7PC9ESVY+CjxESVY+UmVn YXJkcyw8L0RJVj4KPERJVj4mbmJzcDs8L0RJVj4KPERJVj5DYXJsb3M8L0RJVj4KPERJVj4mbmJz cDs8L0RJVj4KPERJVj4mbmJzcDs8L0RJVj4KPERJVj4mbmJzcDs8L0RJVj48L0RJVj48L0RJVj48 L0JPRFk+PC9IVE1MPgoKLS0tLS0tPV9OZXh0UGFydF8wMDBfMTFDN18wMUQyMTU5MC5BMDNERTMx MC0tCgo= --===============7534308228338392582==-- From matonb at ltresources.co.uk Fri Sep 23 06:06:27 2016 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9192944425543979112==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Maton, Brett To: users at ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt Nodes - Which OS Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:06:24 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: 2AD637F6252A40DAAB414EECAB2EDB1D@fintegra.org --===============9192944425543979112== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RHEL / CentOS 7 Are currently recommended, amongst others for Ovirt4. You're getting the packages from ovirt's repository not the distro base so no need to worry that one distro or another is behind which would most likely be the case if you were getting base packages. On 23 September 2016 at 10:50, Carlos Garc=C3=ADa G=C3=B3mez < carlos.garcia(a)f-integra.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I was testing Ovirt inside a VDI proyect. > Now, I know there is new version of Ovrit (4.X) and VDI Software so I have > decided to remake the installation of all. > > I wonder which is the best OS platafform for the *Host (Ovirt - Nodes)*. > (Fedora / Red Hat Enterprise Linux / CentOS) Now I have CentOS 7 64Bit > but... I am not sure. > > What do you think about it? Fedora or CentOS? > Which version? Fedora 19? Fedora 24? CentOS 6? CentOS 7? > > I always had the feeling that Fedora is a little ahead against CentOS for > example oVirt packages. > > Thank you > > Regards, > > Carlos > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > --===============9192944425543979112== Content-Type: text/html MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="attachment.html" PGRpdiBkaXI9Imx0ciI+PGRpdj5SSEVMIC8gQ2VudE9TIDcgQXJlIGN1cnJlbnRseSByZWNvbW1l bmRlZCwgYW1vbmdzdCBvdGhlcnMgZm9yIE92aXJ0NC48YnI+PGJyPjwvZGl2PsKgIFlvdSYjMzk7 cmUgZ2V0dGluZyB0aGUgcGFja2FnZXMgZnJvbSBvdmlydCYjMzk7cyByZXBvc2l0b3J5IG5vdCB0 aGUgZGlzdHJvIGJhc2Ugc28gbm8gbmVlZCB0byB3b3JyeSB0aGF0IG9uZSBkaXN0cm8gb3IgYW5v dGhlciBpcyBiZWhpbmQgd2hpY2ggd291bGQgbW9zdCBsaWtlbHkgYmUgdGhlIGNhc2UgaWYgeW91 IHdlcmUgZ2V0dGluZyBiYXNlIHBhY2thZ2VzLjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJnbWFpbF9l eHRyYSI+PGJyPjxkaXYgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX3F1b3RlIj5PbiAyMyBTZXB0ZW1iZXIgMjAxNiBh dCAxMDo1MCwgQ2FybG9zIEdhcmPDrWEgR8OzbWV6IDxzcGFuIGRpcj0ibHRyIj4mbHQ7PGEgaHJl Zj0ibWFpbHRvOmNhcmxvcy5nYXJjaWFAZi1pbnRlZ3JhLm9yZyIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPmNh cmxvcy5nYXJjaWFAZi1pbnRlZ3JhLm9yZzwvYT4mZ3Q7PC9zcGFuPiB3cm90ZTo8YnI+PGJsb2Nr cXVvdGUgY2xhc3M9ImdtYWlsX3F1b3RlIiBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luOjAgMCAwIC44ZXg7Ym9yZGVy LWxlZnQ6MXB4ICNjY2Mgc29saWQ7cGFkZGluZy1sZWZ0OjFleCI+CjxkaXYgZGlyPSJsdHIiPgo8 ZGl2IGRpcj0ibHRyIj4KPGRpdiBzdHlsZT0iRk9OVC1TSVpFOjEycHQ7Rk9OVC1GQU1JTFk6JiMz OTtDYWxpYnJpJiMzOTs7Q09MT1I6IzAwMDAwMCI+CjxkaXY+SGVsbG8sPC9kaXY+CjxkaXY+wqA8 L2Rpdj4KPGRpdj5JIHdhcyB0ZXN0aW5nwqAgT3ZpcnQgaW5zaWRlIGEgVkRJIHByb3llY3QuPC9k aXY+CjxkaXY+Tm93LCBJIGtub3cgdGhlcmUgaXMgbmV3IHZlcnNpb24gb2YgT3ZyaXQgKDQuWCkg YW5kIFZESSBTb2Z0d2FyZSBzbyBJIGhhdmUgCmRlY2lkZWQgdG8gcmVtYWtlIHRoZSBpbnN0YWxs YXRpb24gb2YgYWxsLjwvZGl2Pgo8ZGl2PsKgPC9kaXY+CjxkaXY+SSB3b25kZXIgd2hpY2ggaXMg dGhlIGJlc3QgT1MgcGxhdGFmZm9ybSBmb3IgdGhlIDxzdHJvbmc+SG9zdCAoT3ZpcnQgLSAKTm9k ZXMpPC9zdHJvbmc+LiAoRmVkb3JhIC8gUmVkIEhhdCBFbnRlcnByaXNlIExpbnV4IC8gQ2VudE9T KSBOb3cgSSBoYXZlIENlbnRPUyAKNyA2NEJpdCBidXQuLi4gSSBhbSBub3Qgc3VyZS48L2Rpdj4K PGRpdj7CoDwvZGl2Pgo8ZGl2PldoYXQgZG8geW91IHRoaW5rIGFib3V0IGl0PyBGZWRvcmEgb3Ig Q2VudE9TPzwvZGl2Pgo8ZGl2PldoaWNoIHZlcnNpb24/IEZlZG9yYSAxOT8gRmVkb3JhIDI0PyBD ZW50T1MgNj8gQ2VudE9TIDc/PC9kaXY+CjxkaXY+wqA8L2Rpdj4KPGRpdj5JIGFsd2F5cyBoYWQg dGhlIGZlZWxpbmcgdGhhdCBGZWRvcmEgaXMgYSBsaXR0bGUgYWhlYWQgYWdhaW5zdCBDZW50T1Mg Zm9yIApleGFtcGxlIG9WaXJ0IHBhY2thZ2VzLjwvZGl2Pgo8ZGl2PsKgPC9kaXY+CjxkaXY+VGhh bmvCoCB5b3U8L2Rpdj4KPGRpdj7CoDwvZGl2Pgo8ZGl2PlJlZ2FyZHMsPC9kaXY+PHNwYW4gY2xh c3M9IkhPRW5aYiI+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiM4ODg4ODgiPgo8ZGl2PsKgPC9kaXY+CjxkaXY+Q2Fy bG9zPC9kaXY+CjxkaXY+wqA8L2Rpdj4KPGRpdj7CoDwvZGl2Pgo8ZGl2PsKgPC9kaXY+PC9mb250 Pjwvc3Bhbj48L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj4KPGJyPl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fXzx3YnI+X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX188YnI+ClVzZXJzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdDxicj4KPGEg aHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOlVzZXJzQG92aXJ0Lm9yZyI+VXNlcnNAb3ZpcnQub3JnPC9hPjxicj4KPGEg aHJlZj0iaHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLm92aXJ0Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3VzZXJzIiByZWw9 Im5vcmVmZXJyZXIiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5odHRwOi8vbGlzdHMub3ZpcnQub3JnLzx3YnI+ bWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby91c2VyczwvYT48YnI+Cjxicj48L2Jsb2NrcXVvdGU+PC9kaXY+PGJy PjwvZGl2Pgo= --===============9192944425543979112==-- From fdeutsch at redhat.com Mon Sep 26 14:54:02 2016 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6653697469288821068==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Fabian Deutsch To: users at ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Ovirt Nodes - Which OS Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 20:53:58 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: CAAn8SBFh1GfxPGhFwJsyf3Gfct62mev5PUDqUJvdj2SxeXK8xg@mail.gmail.com --===============6653697469288821068== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 for CentOS It's currently probably the best tested and most stable platform when looking at CentOS and Fedora. - fabian On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Maton, Brett = wrote: > RHEL / CentOS 7 Are currently recommended, amongst others for Ovirt4. > > You're getting the packages from ovirt's repository not the distro base= so > no need to worry that one distro or another is behind which would most > likely be the case if you were getting base packages. > > On 23 September 2016 at 10:50, Carlos Garc=C3=ADa G=C3=B3mez > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I was testing Ovirt inside a VDI proyect. >> Now, I know there is new version of Ovrit (4.X) and VDI Software so I ha= ve >> decided to remake the installation of all. >> >> I wonder which is the best OS platafform for the Host (Ovirt - Nodes). >> (Fedora / Red Hat Enterprise Linux / CentOS) Now I have CentOS 7 64Bit >> but... I am not sure. >> >> What do you think about it? Fedora or CentOS? >> Which version? Fedora 19? Fedora 24? CentOS 6? CentOS 7? >> >> I always had the feeling that Fedora is a little ahead against CentOS for >> example oVirt packages. >> >> Thank you >> >> Regards, >> >> Carlos >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users(a)ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > -- = Fabian Deutsch RHEV Hypervisor Red Hat --===============6653697469288821068==--