Thanks, I will take a look at it, anyone else currently using Gluster for backend images in production? 


><>
nathan stratton | vp technology | broadsoft, inc | +1-240-404-6580 | www.broadsoft.com


On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Itamar Heim <iheim@redhat.com> wrote:
On 06/09/2014 01:28 PM, Nathan Stratton wrote:
So I understand that the news is still fresh and there may not be much
going on yet in making Ceph work with ovirt, but I thought I would reach
out and see if it was possible to hack them together and still use
librdb rather then NFS.

I know, why not just use Gluster... the problem is I have tried to use
Gluster for VM storage for years and I still don't think it is ready.
Ceph still has work in other areas, but this is one area where I think
it shines. This is a new lab cluster and I would like to try to use ceph
over gluster if possible.

Unless I am missing something, can anyone tell me they are happy with
Gluster as a backend image store? This will be a small 16 node 10 gig
cluster of shared compute / storage (yes I know people want to keep them
separate).

 ><>
nathan stratton | vp technology | broadsoft, inc | +1-240-404-6580 |
www.broadsoft.com <http://www.broadsoft.com>


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users


there was a threat about this recently. afaict, ceph support will require adding a specific ceph storage domain to engine and vdsm, which is a full blown feature (I assume you could try and hack it somewhat with a custom hook). waiting for next version planning cycle to see if/how it gets pushed.