Something isn't right. Are you using centos 7 for hosts or the node ISO. I just setup Vlans and it works just fine on my end.
Try setting the switch ports to access mode with your Vlans, remove the tagging from ovirt and see if it works.
I know that isn't how you want to set things up, but we need to start isolating things... Is it just the gateway.... Can you ping other machines on different subnets... What about pinging google
Don't work.... :'(I'm going to try this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072027
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10720272015-07-02 11:40 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:I'm going to erase everything and the try this:
http://www.ovirt.org/QA:TestCase_Hosted_Engine_Tagged_VLAN_Support2015-07-02 10:41 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:This my last working setup with sloooooooooow reaching of Gateway:After a I mess my oVirt LAB, after trying everything.I reboot the Virtual Machine, same problem: after 15 minutes the Machine can't reach the Gateway, we need HA and 10+ minutes it's not considerated.Today i see the ping working (¿?) Maybe I rush too much...or maybe not.I tried but not works.... I left the Virtual Machine pinging the Gateway after 10 minutes I left my Worstation alone and I went back to my home.I tried a different Aproach:One VLAN for each NIC
DATA CENTERS
Logical Networks:
-----------
Name: ovirtmgmt
Description: Management Network
Network Label: 1
MTU: Default
-----------
Name: dmz
Description: VLAN 50
Network Label: 50
Enable VLAN tagging: 50
VM network
MTU: Default
-----------
Name: Hosting
Description: VLAN 100
Network Label: 100
Enable VLAN tagging: 100
VM network
MTU: Default
------------
CLUSTERS
Logical Networks
ovirtmgmt Assign Required Display Network Migration Network
dmz Assign
Hosting Assign Required
HOSTS
Name: srvovirt02.cnsc.net
Hostname/IP: 192.168.0.63
Network Interfaces
HOSTS BOND VLAN NETWORK NAME ADDRESS MAC SPEED(Mbps) RX(Mbps) TX(Mbps)
eno1 * ovirtmgmt 192.168.0.63 00:17:a4:77:00:18 10000 < 1 < 1
eno2 eno2.50 (50) dmz 192.168.50.8 00:17:a4:77:00:1a 10000 < 1 < 1
ens1f0 ens1f0.100 (100) Hosting 192.168.100.7 00:17:a4:77:00:1c 10000 < 1 < 1
ens1f1 00:17:a4:77:00:1e 0 < 1 < 1
Setup Hosts Networks
Network: ovirtmgmt
Static
IP: 192.168.0.63
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.0.1
Custom Properties: No available keys
Sync network: Yes
Network: dmz
Static
IP: 192.168.50.8
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.224
Gateway: 192.168.50.1
Custom Properties: Please select a key...
Network: Hosting
Static
IP: 192.168.100.7
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.240
Gateway: 192.168.100.1
Custom Properties: Please select a key...
Virtual Machines
Name: PruebaVLAN
Host: srvovirt02.cnsc.net
Edit Network Interface
Name: nic1
Profile: dmz/dmz
Type: VirtIO
Custom MAC address: 00:00:1a:4a:3e:00
Link State: Up
Card Status: Plugged
Network Interfaces in the Host srvovirt02.cnsc.net:
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master ovirtmgmt state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
5: ens1f1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
6: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN
link/ether 72:f8:9c:75:e3:86 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
7: ;vdsmdummy;: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
10: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master dmz state UNKNOWN qlen 500
link/ether fe:00:1a:4a:3e:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fc00:1aff:fe4a:3e00/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
17: eno2.50@eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master dmz state UP
link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
18: dmz: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.50.8/27 brd 192.168.50.31 scope global dmz
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
19: ens1f0.100@ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master Hosting state UP
link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
20: Hosting: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.100.7/28 brd 192.168.100.15 scope global Hosting
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
21: ovirtmgmt: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.0.63/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global ovirtmgmt
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever2015-06-30 21:34 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:You can count on it :)2015-06-30 21:23 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:Let us know how it works out, I am curious to see if having a untagged and tagged interface on the same bridge was an issue.
On Jun 30, 2015 10:21 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks Donny, Tomorrow I'm going to try this. :)2015-06-30 21:12 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:That tells me that there is a tagging issue between the host and the switch.
Untagged traffic flows without issue via the same interface as tagged traffic.
As a personal best practice I separate access ports(untagged) and trunk ports (tagged) traffic on different physical ports.
Can you setup a separate phys interface for the tagged traffic, or must you be able to pass both on the same interface.On Jun 30, 2015 10:05 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:P.S : I want to put VMware in the Trash Can too. ^_ ^My mgmt network works wonderfully, Virtual Machines created on the mgmt even can reach Internet. But my company wants the traffic separated.Thanks Donny, I'm a RHCSA from Colombia, but I'm learning about oVirt. (oVirt is a new thing in my country)2015-06-30 20:59 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:There is a special place in my DC for vmware. TrashCan...lol
On Jun 30, 2015 9:50 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:I'm going to check it out... but how the host can reach the Gateway and the Virtual Machine inside doesn't ?Donny you are very kind, this the last step to free my DataCenter from VMware.2015-06-30 20:46 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:Does your switch have an IP on that vlan... I would step things out VM>host>switch>rtr
You have already confirmed VM to host.
I'm going to look at your screens again to make sure I didn't miss anything
On Jun 30, 2015 9:42 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks for the explanation :)I set everything of the VLANs at oVirt, After I put a IP on the Virtual Machine. But the Virtual Machine can't reach the gateway, The host can do. The Virtual Machine only can reach the host. All the machines of the range of net can reach the Virtual Machine.2015-06-30 20:36 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:I'm asking if your setting the vlan on the VM or at ovirt.
More than likely if you are coming from VMware you have the Vlans set at the hypervisor. This does work in ovirt, I am doing it right now
On Jun 30, 2015 9:31 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:Mmmm I'm new in oVirt :(VMs Interface is Virtual MachineS Interface or VM Network Interface in the host ?I configured the IP of the VLAN in the host.I double check: the NIC of the Host has the VLAN assigned.Can you help me ?2015-06-30 20:11 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:Are you configuring the vms interface with the vlan or tagging at the host.
On Jun 30, 2015 7:28 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks for your response.Any suggestion ?We have HP Switches (HP 5406zl) and they are configurated on trunk mode. (VMware is configurated to use that).Hi Donny
:)2015-06-30 17:51 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:Vlans are layer 2, sounds like a tagging problem. Cisco switches? The tag sticks to the host bridge, but is being stripped off when it leaves the host.... Is your switch in access mode or trunk?
_______________________________________________Hi Friends of oVirt
I'm trying to migrate my company from VMware to oVirt.
In my final tests, I set up 2 more VLANs in oVirt, (VM VLANs)
The Virtual Machines in these VLANs, can be reached from the external IPs from the net range,
but from the Virtual machines only can ping the Host with the Bridge and itself, can't reach the gateway. ¿?
I configured a IP Forwarding in the Host with the virtual machine, and nothing changes...
Any idea ? This is the last duty before embrace oVirt in the company.
Look to the VLAN 100 configuration (My desired VM Network):
http://postimg.org/image/7hrog0a2n/
http://postimg.org/image/68b40i1vr/
http://postimg.org/image/lu6mlshgp/
http://postimg.org/image/540o1qc0t/
http://postimg.org/image/4kyg787bt/
http://postimg.org/image/v7ralh7zb/
http://postimg.org/image/kn903cl03/
For any idea, thanks in advance
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users