Hello Ondra what do you think about this question?ovirt4.py may need some modifications to get required IPs/hostnames when multiple vm has multiple interfaces ?Personalized hack works for me but I have to modify the file each time I upgrade AWX.De: "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com>
À: "Nathanaël Blanchet" <blanchet@abes.fr>
Cc: "users" <users@ovirt.org>
Envoyé: Mercredi 18 Décembre 2019 17:21:40
Objet: Re: [ovirt-users] AWX and error using ovirt as an inventory sourceOn Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 4:59 PM Nathanaël Blanchet <blanchet@abes.fr> wrote:Hello gianluca,
[snip]PS: Something else that may help, try to hack the ovirt4.py with ansible_host if you want to call the hosts into playbook by the hostname and not the first IP:
vi /opt/rh/rh-python36/root/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/awx/plugins/inventory/ovirt4.py
## ajout NBT pour obtenir le nom de l'hote a la place de l ip'affinity_groups': [
Hello,coming back to this PS of yours.in my case vm.name is not always resolvable, so it is not so feasible.But also the default configuration of ansible_host seems quite unfortunate....With the default configuration, I see that for VMs with 2 ips, it gets the eth1 one, not matching the VM hostname and so the job fails because of unreachable host.So I'm trying substituting /var/lib/awx/venv/awx/lib/python3.6/site-packages/awx/plugins/inventory/ovirt4.pyfromreturn {...'devices': dict(
(device.name, [ip.address for ip in device.ips]) for device in devices if device.ips
),'ansible_host': next((device.ips[0].address for device in devices if device.ips), None)
}to:return {...'devices': dict(
(device.name, [ip.address for ip in device.ips]) for device in devices if device.ips
),'ansible_host': vm.fqdn
}If I do this with my test tmp file I see that comparing output of command(py36) bash-4.4# ./ovirt4.pyI have a new value for ansible_host, matching the fqdn of the VMBut going into awx, the job continues to fail and also if I go to inventory -> sources and sync, even if I check all the "update options":OVERWRITEOVERWRITE VARIABLESUPDATE ON LAUNCHStill the vm contains ansible_host with the old value, matching the second interface and not the fqdn...Any suggestion?Gianluca