On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Ayal Baron <abaron@redhat.com> wrote:
> > However, as I read this email, it occurred that some other things> > might not be equal. Specifically, using multiple LUNs could provideWhat's simple in a single host environment is really not that simple when it comes to clusters.
> > a means of shrinking the storage domain in the future. LVM provides
> > a simple means to remove a PV from a VG, but does the engine
> > support
> > this in the CLI or GUI? That is, if the a storage domain has
> > multiple LUNs in it, can those be removed at a later date?
>
> Not yet.
>
>
> Does this mean it is in the works? If not, where could I put in such
> feature request?
>
>
> Certainly, I have no pressing need of this, but it seems like a
> fairly simple thing to implement since I have done it so easily in
> the past with a just a couple of commands outside of an oVirt
> environment. I believe the primary purpose of the LVM functionality
> was to enable removal of dying PVs before they take out an entire
> VG. No reason it would not work just as well to remove a healthy PV.
> It can take a long time to move all the extents off the PV
> requested, but there is command to show the progress, so it would
> also be easy to wrap that in to the GUI.
The tricky part is the coordination between the different hosts and doing it live or with minimal impact.