I tried a different Aproach:

One VLAN for each NIC

I tried but not works.... I left the Virtual Machine pinging the Gateway after 10 minutes I left my Worstation alone and I went back to my home.
Today i see the ping working (¿?) Maybe I rush too much...or maybe not.

I reboot the Virtual Machine, same problem: after 15 minutes the Machine can't reach the Gateway, we need HA and 10+ minutes it's not considerated.

After a I mess my oVirt LAB, after trying everything.

This my last working setup with sloooooooooow reaching of Gateway:

DATA CENTERS

Logical Networks:
-----------
Name: ovirtmgmt
Description: Management Network
Network Label: 1
MTU: Default
-----------
Name: dmz
Description: VLAN 50
Network Label: 50
Enable VLAN tagging: 50
VM network
MTU: Default
-----------
Name: Hosting
Description: VLAN 100
Network Label: 100
Enable VLAN tagging: 100
VM network
MTU: Default
------------

CLUSTERS

Logical Networks

ovirtmgmt Assign Required Display Network Migration Network
dmz         Assign
Hosting    Assign Required

HOSTS

Name: srvovirt02.cnsc.net
Hostname/IP: 192.168.0.63

Network Interfaces

HOSTS     BOND      VLAN            NETWORK NAME    ADDRESS           MAC                       SPEED(Mbps)    RX(Mbps)       TX(Mbps)

eno1                                             * ovirtmgmt          192.168.0.63           00:17:a4:77:00:18     10000                 < 1           < 1

eno2                eno2.50 (50)              dmz                  192.168.50.8          00:17:a4:77:00:1a     10000                  < 1           < 1

ens1f0             ens1f0.100 (100)        Hosting             192.168.100.7        00:17:a4:77:00:1c      10000                  < 1           < 1

ens1f1                                                                                                  00:17:a4:77:00:1e     0                         < 1           < 1

Setup Hosts Networks

Network: ovirtmgmt
Static
IP: 192.168.0.63
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.0.1
Custom Properties: No available keys
Sync network: Yes

Network: dmz
Static
IP: 192.168.50.8
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.224
Gateway: 192.168.50.1
Custom Properties: Please select a key...

Network: Hosting
Static
IP: 192.168.100.7
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.240
Gateway: 192.168.100.1
Custom Properties: Please select a key...

Virtual Machines

Name: PruebaVLAN
Host: srvovirt02.cnsc.net

Edit Network Interface

Name: nic1
Profile: dmz/dmz
Type: VirtIO
Custom MAC address: 00:00:1a:4a:3e:00
Link State: Up
Card Status: Plugged

Network Interfaces in the Host srvovirt02.cnsc.net:

1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master ovirtmgmt state UP qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
5: ens1f1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
6: bond0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN
    link/ether 72:f8:9c:75:e3:86 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
7: ;vdsmdummy;: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN
    link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
10: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master dmz state UNKNOWN qlen 500
    link/ether fe:00:1a:4a:3e:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet6 fe80::fc00:1aff:fe4a:3e00/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
17: eno2.50@eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master dmz state UP
    link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
18: dmz: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
    link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.50.8/27 brd 192.168.50.31 scope global dmz
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1a/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
19: ens1f0.100@ens1f0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master Hosting state UP
    link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
20: Hosting: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
    link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:1c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.100.7/28 brd 192.168.100.15 scope global Hosting
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:1c/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
21: ovirtmgmt: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
    link/ether 00:17:a4:77:00:18 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.0.63/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global ovirtmgmt
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::217:a4ff:fe77:18/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

2015-06-30 21:34 GMT-05:00 Julián Tete <danteconrad14@gmail.com>:
You can count on it :)

2015-06-30 21:23 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:

Let us know how it works out, I am curious to see if having a untagged and tagged interface on the same bridge was an issue.

On Jun 30, 2015 10:21 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Donny, Tomorrow I'm going to try this. :)

2015-06-30 21:12 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:

That tells me that there is a tagging issue between the host and the switch.
Untagged traffic flows without issue via the same interface as tagged traffic.
As a personal best practice I separate access ports(untagged) and trunk ports (tagged) traffic on different physical ports.
Can you setup a separate phys interface for the tagged traffic, or must you be able to pass both on the same interface.

On Jun 30, 2015 10:05 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
My mgmt network works wonderfully, Virtual Machines created on the mgmt even can reach Internet. But my company wants the traffic separated.

Thanks Donny, I'm a RHCSA from Colombia, but I'm learning about oVirt. (oVirt is a new thing in my country)

P.S : I want to put VMware in the Trash Can too. ^_ ^

2015-06-30 20:59 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:

There is a special place in my DC for vmware. TrashCan...lol

On Jun 30, 2015 9:50 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm going to check it out... but how the host can reach the Gateway and the Virtual Machine inside doesn't ?

Donny you are very kind, this the last step to free my DataCenter from VMware.

2015-06-30 20:46 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:

Does your switch have an IP on that vlan... I would step things out VM>host>switch>rtr

You have already confirmed VM to host.

I'm going to look at your screens again to make sure I didn't miss anything

On Jun 30, 2015 9:42 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for the explanation :)

I set everything of the VLANs at oVirt, After I put a IP on the Virtual Machine. But the Virtual Machine can't reach the gateway, The host can do. The Virtual Machine only can reach the host. All the machines of the range of net can reach the Virtual Machine.

2015-06-30 20:36 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:

I'm asking if your setting the vlan on the VM or at ovirt.

More than likely if you are coming from VMware you have the Vlans set at the hypervisor. This does work in ovirt, I am doing it right now

On Jun 30, 2015 9:31 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
Mmmm I'm new in oVirt :(

VMs Interface is Virtual MachineS Interface or VM Network Interface in the host ?

I configured the IP of the VLAN in the host.

I double check: the NIC of the Host has the VLAN assigned.

Can you help me ?

2015-06-30 20:11 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:

Are you configuring the vms interface with the vlan or tagging at the host.

On Jun 30, 2015 7:28 PM, "Julián Tete" <danteconrad14@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Donny

We have HP Switches (HP 5406zl) and they are configurated on trunk mode. (VMware is configurated to use that).

Any suggestion ?

Thanks for your response.

:)

2015-06-30 17:51 GMT-05:00 Donny Davis <donny@cloudspin.me>:

Vlans are layer 2, sounds like a tagging problem. Cisco switches? The tag sticks to the host bridge, but is being stripped off when it leaves the host.... Is your switch in access mode or trunk?

Hi Friends of oVirt

I'm trying to migrate my company from VMware to oVirt.
In my final tests, I set up 2 more VLANs in oVirt, (VM VLANs)
The Virtual Machines in these VLANs, can be reached from the external IPs from the net range,
but from the Virtual machines only can ping the Host with the Bridge and itself, can't reach the gateway. ¿?

I configured a IP Forwarding in the Host with the virtual machine, and nothing changes...

Any idea ? This is the last duty before embrace oVirt in the company.

Look to the VLAN 100 configuration (My desired VM Network):

http://postimg.org/image/7hrog0a2n/

http://postimg.org/image/68b40i1vr/

http://postimg.org/image/lu6mlshgp/

http://postimg.org/image/540o1qc0t/

http://postimg.org/image/4kyg787bt/

http://postimg.org/image/v7ralh7zb/

http://postimg.org/image/kn903cl03/

For any idea, thanks in advance

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users