On 06/07/15 15:03, Tiemen Ruiten wrote:
> Please note I will -not- be using Hosted Engine.
>
> On 6 July 2015 at 13:54, Tiemen Ruiten <t.ruiten@rdmedia.com

> <mailto:t.ruiten@rdmedia.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     I'm in the planning stage of setting up a new oVirt cluster, where I
>     would prefer to use the local disks of the hypervisors for a
>     GlusterFS storage domain. What is the current recommendation (for
>     version 3.5.x)?
>
>     I found this presentation which seems to suggest that it's possbile
>     with some
>     caveats: http://www.ovirt.org/images/6/6c/2015-ovirt-glusterfs-hyperconvergence.pdf
>
>     And a few open bugs:
>
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177791
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177775
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177773
>
>     What I can't find is current information on if this setup is already
>     possible with 3.5.x or it's better to wait for 3.6. Could someone
>     enlighten me?
>
>     --
>     Tiemen Ruiten
>     Systems Engineer
>     R&D Media
>
>
>
>
> --
> Tiemen Ruiten
> Systems Engineer
> R&D Media
>
>

Hi,
most of the current work is focused in hyperconverged using hosted engine and
this includes the installation and a few other features such as not fencing hypervisors
to avoid killing running bricks.
If you do not want to use hosted engine, then you should be able to create bricks
and manage them as a gluster volume which your setup should be able to work with.
If you do not use HA and/or fencing you should be mostly ok with this use case.

Anything specific you're looking for?