It seems to me we still need a way to provide the WTG ISOs. Maybe
include an option in engine to upload them to the an ISO domain the
user creates?
Or perhaps find a way to make them available for use without defining
an explicit ISO domain?
> _______________________________________________
On 20 May 2016 at 14:32, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to get comments on removing ISO domain creation from engine-setup.
>
> ISO domain creation was included in 3.2 for allowing to finish the setup
> with ISO domain ready to serve Windows Guest Tools which is injected into
> the iso domain if the rpm is installed.
> The NFS share was created *(rw) in 3.2.
> In later releases we first restricted access, then asked the user to provide
> access policy during setup and now we moved the default to not create the
> ISO domain.
>
> We have several issues with iso domain creation:
>
> Bug 1302745 - [engine-setup] creation of iso domain path is not rolled back,
> a next attempt leaves an empty domain
>
> Bug 1332813 - Hosted engine should not allow iso domain to be configured in
> the RHEV-M VM
>
> Having ISO domain within hosted engine leads to really bad issues and we're
> streamlining the hosted engine installation with NGN, cockpit and appliance
> so HE will be the most easy way to have oVirt installed making ISO domain
> not useful and even dangerous in engine-setup.
>
> For this reason the bug has ben changed in: Deprecate the ISO domain setup
> on the RHEV-M machine (hide it in 4.0)
> Meaning that using answer file you'll be able to create it anyway in 4.0 but
> the question won't be exposed in interactive setup.
>
> Any concern about this change? Any comment?
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> Sandro Bonazzola
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> See how it works at redhat.com
>
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Barak Korren
bkorren@redhat.com
RHEV-CI Team