cc'ing Denis and Sahina,Perhaps they can share their expirience and insights with the hyperconverged environment.Regards,MaorOn Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Tal Bar-Or <tbaror@gmail.com> wrote:Hello All,I am about deploying a new Ovirt system for our developers that we plan to be hyperconverged environment Node based.The system workload would be mostly used for builders that compiling our code , which involves with lots of small files and intensive IO.I plan to build two glustered volume "layers" one based on sas drives for OS spin on, and second for Nvme based for intensive IO.I would expect that the system will be resilient/high availability and in the same time give enough good IO request for vm builders that will be at least 6 to 8 vm guests.The system hardware would be as follows:chassis: 4x HP DL380 gen8each server hardware:cpu: 2x e5-2690v2memory:256GBDisks:12x 1.2TB sas 10k disks , 2 mirror for os (or using usk kingstone 2x 128gb mirror) rest for vm os volume.Nvme: 2x960GB Kingstone KC1000 for builders compiling source codeNetwork: 4 ports Intel 10Gbit/s SFP +Given above configuration and theory, my question would be what would be best practice in terms of Gluster configuration Distributed,Replicated,Distributed Replicated,Dispersed,Distributed Dispersed?What is the suggestion for hardware raid type 5 or 6 , or use ZFS?Network nodes communication , i intend to use 3 ports for storage communication and one port for guests network , my question regarding Gluster inter communication , what is better would i gail from 3x 10G LACP or 1 network for each gluster volume?Please adviceThanks
--Tal Bar-or
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/4XKEEDT2HHVDQU7FZCANZ26UOMFJTBE5/