Best regards,
Shirly Radco
BI Software Engineer
Red Hat Israel Ltd.
34 Jerusalem Road
Building A, 4th floor
Ra'anana, Israel 4350109
----- Le 8 Déc 16, à 15:18, Roy Golan <rgolan@redhat.com> a écrit :______________________________3. paste it to http://paste.fedoraproject.2. review the /tmp/vacuum.log1. sudo su - postgres -c "psql engine -c 'vacuum verbose'" &> /tmp/vacuum.logThe result can be pretty verbose but again will not disclose sensitive info. Anyway review it before pasting it. It should look something like that(a snippet of one table):Hi all,Following the thread about vacuum tool [1] I would like to gather some feedback about your deployment's db vacuum status The info is completely anonymous and function running it is a read only reporting one and should have little or no effect on the db.
INFO: vacuuming "pg_catalog.pg_ts_template"
INFO: index "pg_ts_template_tmplname_index" now contains 5 row versions in 2 pages
DETAIL: 0 index row versions were removed.
0 index pages have been deleted, 0 are currently reusable.
CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.org/ and reply with the link here
[1] http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/devel/2016-December/ 014484.html Thanks,Roy_________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users But, we run a full vacuum about one month ago that have free about 8GB of space and we set DWH_SAMPLING=60 to decrease data size of DWH (install is ~ 1y and half old, updated from 3.5 to 3.6 to 4.0).Have a nice day.Regards.--Baptiste
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users