On 11/24/2017 06:41 AM, Sahina Bose wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Jiří Sléžka <jiri.slezka@slu.cz
> <mailto:jiri.slezka@slu.cz>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     On 11/22/2017 07:30 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>     > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:22 PM Jiří Sléžka <jiri.slezka@slu.cz <mailto:jiri.slezka@slu.cz>
>     > <mailto:jiri.slezka@slu.cz <mailto:jiri.slezka@slu.cz>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Hi,
>     >
>     >     I am trying realize why is exporting of vm to export storage on
>     >     glusterfs such slow.
>     >
>     >     I am using oVirt and RHV, both instalations on version 4.1.7.
>     >
>     >     Hosts have dedicated nics for rhevm network - 1gbps, data
>     storage itself
>     >     is on FC.
>     >
>     >     GlusterFS cluster lives separate on 4 dedicated hosts. It has
>     slow disks
>     >     but I can achieve about 200-400mbit throughput in other
>     applications (we
>     >     are using it for "cold" data, backups mostly).
>     >
>     >     I am using this glusterfs cluster as backend for export
>     storage. When I
>     >     am exporting vm I can see only about 60-80mbit throughput.
>     >
>     >     What could be the bottleneck here?
>     >
>     >     Could it be qemu-img utility?
>     >
>     >     vdsm      97739  0.3  0.0 354212 29148 ?        S<l  15:43   0:06
>     >     /usr/bin/qemu-img convert -p -t none -T none -f raw
>     >   
>      /rhev/data-center/2ff6d0ee-a10b-473d-b77c-be9149945f5f/ff3cd56a-1005-4426-8137-8f422c0b47c1/images/ba42cbcc-c068-4df8-af3d-00f2077b1e27/c57acd5f-d6cf-48cc-ad0c-4a7d979c0c1e
>     >     -O raw
>     >   
>      /rhev/data-center/mnt/glusterSD/10.20.30.41:_rhv__export/81094499-a392-4ea2-b081-7c6288fbb636/images/ba42cbcc-c068-4df8-af3d-00f2077b1e27/c57acd5f-d6cf-48cc-ad0c-4a7d979c0c1e
>     >
>     >     Any idea how to make it work faster or what throughput should I
>     >     expected?
>     >
>     >
>     > gluster storage operations are using fuse mount - so every write:
>     > - travel to the kernel
>     > - travel back to the gluster fuse helper process
>     > - travel to all 3 replicas - replication is done on client side
>     > - return to kernel when all writes succeeded
>     > - return to caller
>     >
>     > So gluster will never set any speed record.
>     >
>     > Additionally, you are copying from raw lv on FC - qemu-img cannot do
>     > anything
>     > smart and avoid copying unused clusters. Instead if copies
>     gigabytes of
>     > zeros
>     > from FC.
>
>     ok, it does make sense
>
>     > However 7.5-10 MiB/s sounds too slow.
>     >
>     > I would try to test with dd - how much time it takes to copy
>     > the same image from FC to your gluster storage?
>     >
>     > dd
>     > if=/rhev/data-center/2ff6d0ee-a10b-473d-b77c-be9149945f5f/ff3cd56a-1005-4426-8137-8f422c0b47c1/images/ba42cbcc-c068-4df8-af3d-00f2077b1e27/c57acd5f-d6cf-48cc-ad0c-4a7d979c0c1e
>     > of=/rhev/data-center/mnt/glusterSD/10.20.30.41:_rhv__export/81094499-a392-4ea2-b081-7c6288fbb636/__test__
>     > bs=8M oflag=direct status=progress
>
>     unfrotunately dd performs the same
>
>     1778384896 bytes (1.8 GB) copied, 198.565265 s, 9.0 MB/s
>
>
>     > If dd can do this faster, please ask on qemu-discuss mailing list:
>     > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-discuss
>     <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-discuss>
>     >
>     > If both give similar results, I think asking in gluster mailing list
>     > about this can help. Maybe your gluster setup can be optimized.
>
>     ok, this is definitly on the gluster side. Thanks for your guidance.
>
>     I will investigate the gluster side and also will try Export on NFS
>     share.
>
>
> [Adding gluster users ml]
>
> Please provide "gluster volume info" output for the rhv_export gluster
> volume and also volume profile details (refer to earlier mail from Shani
> on how to run this) while performing the dd operation above.

you can find all this output on https://pastebin.com/sBK01VS8

as mentioned in other posts. Gluster cluster uses really slow (green)
disks but without direct io it can achieve throughput around 400mbit/s.

This storage is used mostly for backup purposes. It is not used as a vm
storage.

In my case it would be nice not to use direct io in export case but I
understand why it might not be wise.

Cheers,

Jiri

>
>  
>
>
>     Cheers,
>
>     Jiri
>
>
>     >
>     > Nir
>     >  
>     >
>     >
>     >     Cheers,
>     >
>     >     Jiri
>     >
>     >
>     >     _______________________________________________
>     >     Users mailing list
>     >     Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
>     <mailto:Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>>
>     >     http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>     <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>     >
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Users mailing list
>     Users@ovirt.org <mailto:Users@ovirt.org>
>     http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>     <http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users>
>
>


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users