Hi,

Thanks a lot for your answer.

 

I applied some updates at node level, but I forgot to upgrade the engine !

 

When I try to do so I get a strange error : "Cluster PROD is at version 4.2 which is not supported by this upgrade flow. Please fix it before upgrading."

 

Here are the installed packets on my nodes :

python-ovirt-engine-sdk4-4.2.2-2.el7.centos.x86_64
ovirt-imageio-common-1.2.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-hosted-engine-setup-2.2.3-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-engine-sdk-python-3.6.9.1-1.el7.noarch
ovirt-setup-lib-1.1.4-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-release42-4.2.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-imageio-daemon-1.2.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-host-dependencies-4.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64
ovirt-host-4.2.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64
ovirt-host-deploy-1.7.0-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-hosted-engine-ha-2.2.2-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-provider-ovn-driver-1.2.2-1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-engine-appliance-4.2-20171219.1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-vmconsole-host-1.0.4-1.el7.noarch
cockpit-ovirt-dashboard-0.11.3-0.1.el7.centos.noarch
ovirt-vmconsole-1.0.4-1.el7.noarch

 

What I am supposed to do ? I see no newer packages available.

 

Regards

Le 07-Feb-2018 13:23:43 +0100, mburman@redhat.com a écrit:

Hi

This is a bug and it was already fixed in 4.2.1.1-0.1.el7 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528906

The no default route bug was fixed in - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477589

Thanks,

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:15 PM, <spfma.tech@e.mail.fr> wrote:

 

Hi,

I am experiencing a new problem : when I try to modify something in the network setup on the second node (added to the cluster after installing the engine on the other one) using the Engine GUI, I get the following error when validating :

 

    must match "^\b((25[0-5]|2[0-4]\d|[01]\d\d|\d?\d)\_){3}(25[0-5]|2[0-4]\d|[01]\d\d|\d?\d)"
    Attribut : ipConfiguration.iPv4Addresses[0].gateway

 

Moreover, on the general status of ther server, I have a "Host has no default route" alert.

 

The ovirtmgmt network has a defined gateway of course, and the storage network has none because it is not required. Both server have the same setup, with different addresses of course :-)

 

I have not been able to find anything useful in the logs.

 

Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong ?

 

Regards

---

FreeMail powered by mail.fr
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

--

Michael Burman

Senior Quality engineer - rhv network - redhat israel

Red Hat

mburman@redhat.com    M: 0545355725     IM: mburman

---

FreeMail powered by mail.fr

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users