On 9 Dec 2020, at 09:09, jb <jonbae77@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks Michal for the explanation. I will dive in this article and see if I understand it :-).
I use here the latest 4.4.3.12 Version. So I can hope, that newer version will support my CPUs better :).
Best regards
Jonathan
Am 08.12.20 um 19:12 schrieb Michal Skrivanek:
qemu CPUs are mostly mapping to microarchitectures, for this one there’s excessive number of details at [1] :)
but yours seems to be CofeeLake (8th gen) which is not really supported yet in that version. Well, you didn’t say anything about what your version is, so I don’t know for sure…
It’s usually a compromise between what the hardware has and what has been implemented just yet
Thanks,michal
[1] https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/intel/microarchitectures/skylake_(server)
On 8 Dec 2020, at 17:09, jb <jonbae77@gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________I get this output:
"cpuFlags": "sse4_2,hle,mpx,pti,pge,pbe,rtm,popcnt,cpuid,md-clear,lm,invtsc,invpcid_single,ibrs,tsc_deadline_timer,movbe,avx2,ibpb,pse36,umip,hypervisor,erms,fpu,bts,monitor,cmov,arch-capabilities,nx,mca,abm,pschange-mc-no,aes,ht,xsaves,ds_cpl,nonstop_tsc,adx,epb,bmi2,hwp,hwp_act_window,dtherm,aperfmperf,vme,invpcid,art,nopl,fsgsbase,pts,sep,cx8,msr,acpi,x2apic,xgetbv1,fma,flush_l1d,vmx,sse2,pat,constant_tsc,ssbd,sdbg,rdrand,clflushopt,cx16,ept,tsc_adjust,intel_pt,pse,de,stibp,sse,vpid,hwp_epp,ida,xsavec,arat,pae,clflush,tm,rdtscp,lahf_lm,cpuid_fault,pclmulqdq,fxsr,flexpriority,mtrr,syscall,ssse3,pdcm,3dnowprefetch,sse4_1,smep,rep_good,est,tpr_shadow,smap,dts,skip-l1dfl-vmentry,tm2,vnmi,hwp_notify,tsc_known_freq,mmx,dtes64,xsave,arch_perfmon,avx,rdseed,smx,ss,xtpr,f16c,bmi1,pni,pdpe1gb,apic,mce,xtopology,xsaveopt,pebs,pcid,tsc,md_clear,amd-ssbd,pln,spec_ctrl,model_Conroe,model_kvm32,model_Penryn,model_Skylake-Client-noTSX-IBRS,model_IvyBridge-IBRS,model_Broadwell-noTSX-IBRS,model_Opteron_G2,model_n270,model_SandyBridge-IBRS,model_pentium,model_kvm64,model_Westmere,model_Haswell-noTSX-IBRS,model_Haswell,model_pentium2,model_pentium3,model_Westmere-IBRS,model_Opteron_G1,model_Skylake-Client-IBRS,model_Nehalem,model_coreduo,model_Skylake-Client,model_qemu64,model_Haswell-IBRS,model_Haswell-noTSX,model_Broadwell-IBRS,model_IvyBridge,model_core2duo,model_486,model_Nehalem-IBRS,model_Broadwell-noTSX,model_SandyBridge,model_Broadwell,model_qemu32",
"cpuModel": "Intel(R) Xeon(R) E-2246G CPU @ 3.60GHz",
"cpuSockets": "1",
"cpuSpeed": "4499.377",
"cpuThreads": "12",
"deferred_preallocation": true,
Does this says something to you?
Am 08.12.20 um 17:02 schrieb Vinícius Ferrão:
AFAIK Client is for the i3/i5/i7/i9 families and the other one is for Xeon platforms.
But you have pretty unusually Xeon, so it may be missing some flags that will properly classify the CPU.
You can run this on the host to check what’s detected:
[root]# vdsm-client Host getCapabilities
Sent from my iPhone
On 8 Dec 2020, at 10:52, jb <jonbae77@gmail.com> wrote:
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/XXI2TXLN6BW4PISDQXQGNZL5WB32CGKV/