Hi Jason,
El 2019-08-06 22:43, Jason M. Stallings escribió:
> Nicolas:
>
> Thank you very much for this! Looks like exactly what I was looking
> for... The first burst was somewhat frightening but it ended well and
> now no storage domain is overused :)
>
Glad to hear that!
> One quick question: Is it possible to limit balancing to more than one
> datacenter? I have 3 datacenters and I'd like to exclude one of them.
> I see the DATACENTER config variable could do this but I'm not sure
> how to define more than one datacenter.
>
Currently, the DATACENTER parameter only allows one value. When
developing the code I didn't expect someone having more than two Data
Centers :-)
As a workaround, if you want to exclude the Storage Domains of an entire
Data Center, you can exclude them explicitly using the "NOBALANCE"
parameter of the config file, which does allow several values.
Ok, that works. I have few storage domains so no problem adding them to the list.
Thanks!!
If you consider this is something that should be implemented, feel free
to fill an issue or extend the code and send a Pull Request.
It's ok that way, no need to change it as far as I'm concerned
Thank you
Regards.
> Thanks
>
> El mar., 6 ago. 2019 a las 15:05, <nicolas@devels.es> escribió:
>
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> A time ago I wrote a "Storage Balancer" exactly for that, move
>> disks
>> between storage domains to keep them below a maximum threshold of
>> occupation. You can find the project at [1].
>>
>> It's not perfect but has been working for us for the last 3 years
>> with
>> no issues.
>>
>> That won't avoid people storing new disks in the first available
>> storage
>> domain, but the balancer will distribute them between the less
>> occupied
>> storage domains afterwards.
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>>
>> Nicolás
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/nkovacne/ovirt-storage-balancer [1]
>>
>> El 2019-08-04 17:57, Jason M. Stallings escribió:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I'm trying to figure out a way to automatically distribute our
>> storage
>>> domain occupation evenly or at least avoid them getting full. We
>> have
>>> a lot of users creating vms and they seem to select the first
>>> available storage domain, thus one is nearly full and the rest
>> are
>>> barely used.
>>>
>>> Is there a way to accomplish that?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> Jason
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org
>>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ [2]
>>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ [3]
>>> List Archives:
>>>
>>
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/F66H6U2CWHUFK2N4IIZWAXBF7ZYDO6KL/
>> [4]
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org
>> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ [2]
>> oVirt Code of Conduct:
>> https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ [3]
>> List Archives:
>>
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/VTWOMW6VMGK6NDV5UTFNZHKOSBP4N66K/
>> [5]
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] https://github.com/nkovacne/ovirt-storage-balancer
> [2] https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> [3] https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> [4]
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/F66H6U2CWHUFK2N4IIZWAXBF7ZYDO6KL/
> [5]
> https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/VTWOMW6VMGK6NDV5UTFNZHKOSBP4N66K/