This is the same question as in RHEL or Fedora IMO: do you want the bleeding edge features and lower code stability and reliability, or do you want to have techsupport (and that means a real SLA and an escalation path up to the engineering, if need be) behind you, stable and reliable, well tested code, but less of the advanced features.

On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Martijn Grendelman <martijn.grendelman@isaac.nl> wrote:

Hi,

This may be the wrong place to ask, but I'm looking for input to form an
opinion on an "oVirt or RHEV" question within my company.

I have been running oVirt for about 5 months now, and I'm quite
comfortable with its features and maintenance procedures. We are now
planning to build a private virtualization cluster for hosting clients'
applications as well as our own. Some people in the company are
questioning whether we should buy RHEV, but at this point, I can't see
the benefits.

Can anyone on this list shed a light on when RHEV might be a better
choice than oVirt? What are the benefits? The trade-offs?

I am looking for pragmatic, real-world things, not marketing mumbo
jumbo. That, I can get from redhat.com ;-)

Best regards,
Martijn.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users