If 58.4% use Hosted Engine, and 65.8% of them use it in Hyperconverged setup, then at least 38.4% of all users have Hyperconverged setup, but only 25.9% use Gluster.
What is Hyperconverged setup in at least 12.5% of all cases?
From: <users-bounces@ovirt.org> on behalf of Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>
Date: Friday, 14 April 2017 at 11:27
To: users <users@ovirt.org>, devel <devel@ovirt.org>, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh@redhat.com>, Brian Stinson <bstinson@redhat.com>, Johnny Hughes <jhughes@redhat.com>, Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>, Sahina Bose <sabose@redhat.com>
Subject: [ovirt-users] How do you oVirt? Here the answers!
Hi,
a few weeks ago I opened a survey asking oVirt users about how they use oVirt.
Here are the analytics of the survey:
https://docs.google.com/forms/
d/1s3k4pq_U4vHTuUUKr6dOosGj_ EGFxqEisansHlqnyyM/ viewanalytics#responses
Most notable facts:
- 197 responses, two times the responses we got with the 3.6 survey!
- CentOS confims as the most used distribution for running oVirt engine (89.8%) and Hypervisors (74.3% which become 94.2% including oVirt Node which is a CentOS spin)
- Fedora is the second distribution (4.6%) mostly used only for runnig oVirt engine
- oVirt Node jumped from 7.1% on 3.6 survey to 19.9% in 4.1!
- Surprisingly we have someone running both engine and hypervisor on Ubuntu based system, within VMs. I'd like to hear more about this use case.
- Within other OS we had Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7 and Scientific Linux (I guess 7, wasn't specified)
- Within the storage, there isn't a "winner" between NFS, Gluster and iSCSI. Within Other Storage, Fiber Channel is the most used. We had also: Ceph, DAS, EMC ScaleIO, GPFS
- Hosted Engine is the most used deployment choice with 58.4% (was 50.0% in 3.6)
- 65.8% of Hosted Engine users use it in Hyperconverged setup.
Thank you for your feedback and appreciation, we'll look into suggestions you sent in the survey.
--
SANDRO BONAZZOLA
ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D