On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 4 January 2017 at 09:57, Roy Golan <rgolan@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I'm getting the feeling I'm not alone in this, authoring and publishing a
>> wiki page isn't as used to be for long time.
>
> Maybe we're using the wrong tool for the job?
> The site is intentionally not a wiki to allow OSAS some editorial
> control over what goes on the public site.
>
> I'm guessing that the scenario you are talking about here is a
> developer looking to create a preliminary design document for further
> discussion. Maybe we need a different tool and process for that?
I agree, we are using the wrong tool for the job of putting initial design
for discussion.
For publishing user documentation the site is ok.
I miss the wiki we had, it was easier to use for development of feature
pages and developer documentation.
Nir