Yes network speed is a problem, your are right! With the storage capacity I have to add to my though, that I would need 3 x 2 TB distributed over 3 machines, so every computer only needs 2 TB.

I don't know glusterfs much, I only like the benefits. In term of hardware requirements I know for example that zfs don't need much CPU power, but a fer amount of RAM. Would this be the same with gluster?

Am So., 3. März 2019 um 17:42 Uhr schrieb Strahil <hunter86_bg@yahoo.com>:

The problem is that anything on the budged doesn't have decent network + enough storage slots.
Maybe a homemade workstation with AMD ryzen could do the trick - but this is way over the budged compared to raspberry Pi-s

Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn Mar 3, 2019 12:22, Jonathan Baecker <jonbae77@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello everybody!
>
> Does anyone here have experience with a cheap, energy-saving glusterfs
> storage solution? I'm thinking of something that has more power than a
> rasbian Pi, 3 x 2 TB (SSD) storage, but doesn't cost much more and
> doesn't consume much more power.
>
> Would that be possible? I know the "Red Hat Gluster Storage"
> requirements, but are they generally so high? Only a few VM images would
> have to be on it...
>
> Greetings
>
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@ovirt.org
> Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/
> oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
> List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/NWOA24SHB2CV6SDVBIYPL5PJELJDZRND/