Hi Sandro

Thanks for sharing, probably the stand out question to the uninitiated would be; why not integrate oVirt as OpenShift's virtualization stack? 

Thanks
Angus



From: Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, 21 February 2022, 8:31 am
To: Nathanaël Blanchet
Cc: users
Subject: [ovirt-users] Re: oVirt alternatives



Il giorno dom 20 feb 2022 alle ore 22:47 Nathanaël Blanchet <blanchet@abes.fr> ha scritto:
Hello, Is okd/openshift virtualization designed to be a full replacement of ovirt/redhat by embedding the same level of advanced

oVirt is a very mature project, integrated with most of the Red Hat ecosystem, mostly being maintained without any new big features.
It has live-snapshot, live-storage-migration, memory overcommit management, passthrough of a very specific PCI device on a particular host, a VM portal, OpenShift IPI.
It lacks integrated container management.

OKD Virtualization is being very actively developed quickly closing gaps.
It has integrated container management, ability to leverage the k8s distributed architecture/infrastructure and to leverage k8s assets like exclusive CPU placements.
It currently lacks live-snapshot, live-storage-migration, memory overcommit management, passthrough of a very specific PCI device on a particular host, VM portal (OKD UI is more similar to Admin portal), thin-provisioning (of VMs on top of templates), hot (un)plug (disk/memory/NIC), high availability with VM leases, incremental backup, VDI features like template versions, sealing (virt-sysprep).

So OKD is not feature complete replacement for oVirt yet.

--

Sandro Bonazzola

MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV

Red Hat EMEA

sbonazzo@redhat.com   

Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to answer this email out of your office hours.