On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Sebastian Greco
<sgreco@essiprojects.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Barak Korren <bkorren@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> VMs are not
>> very interesting as a use case for RHV customers. When y
>
>
> Thx for the answsers. I see that it's the second time that someone from RH
> points out that customers are not interested in this feature. While I can't
> argue with that, what I do can say is that "non-customers" (most of
> companies out there using vsphere or hyper-v) feel dissapointed towards this
> solution for things like this one (for this case, 2 of my customers are
> missing this, we are deploying RHV to one of them this week).
>
> I don't see how this lack of flexibility is something good, and so far from
> my experience with customers which I'm trying to convince to start using
> RHV, when they finally do agree to start with one or two servers (following
> the RHCI roadmap evolution to the hybrid cloud), they see things like this
> and dismiss this solution sooner than later.
>
> Anyways, question has been answer "yes, is technically possible but by
> design it is not going to happen",

Not sure how you got this impression from current discussion. On the
contrary - people are working on this, and it was planned to be completed
in 4.0, but eventually postponed.

Best,

> and I wouldn't like to convert this
> thread or abuse your kindness deviating the subject :)
>
> Thx again guys for the help,
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@ovirt.org
> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>



--
Didi