On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Bryan Sockel <Bryan.Sockel@altn.com> wrote:
Yes that is the document i have been looking at, unfortunately i am still pretty new to the ovirt/gluster world.  But both seem like the would be a great fit for our goals.

Indeed it will be a great solution for specific scenarios.
If you can afford to wait for a few months a robust hyperonvergence integration, you can start playing with it knowing that today it's still not production ready.
Any feedback on that solution will be really appreciated.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Simone Tiraboschi <stirabos@redhat.com>
To: Bryan Sockel <Bryan.Sockel@altn.com>
Cc: users <users@ovirt.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 18:12:29 +0200
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Hardware setup
 
 
 
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Bryan Sockel <Bryan.Sockel@altn.com> wrote:
Hi,
 
I am looking to put together a configuration setup for a new install and was wondering if it is ok for have both gluster and ovirt running on the same systems, or if it was better to separate my storage on to anther platform?
 
I am currently looking into 3 servers with 196 GB Ram, dual 6 core proc's on each server.  Gluster would be installed on each server with a 3 way replica, ovirt would be running as an appliance and each node would be part of the ovirt cluster.
 
 
That approach is called hyper-converged.
With 4.0 is still somehow bleeding edge and not recommended for a production env; a stable solution will come quite early.
If you want start playing with it you can take a look at this article which exactly covers what you want to do:
 
 

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users